Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 9:9:369.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00369. eCollection 2017.

Assessing Executive Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Critical Review of Brief Neuropsychological Tools

Affiliations
Review

Assessing Executive Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Critical Review of Brief Neuropsychological Tools

Helena S Moreira et al. Front Aging Neurosci. .

Abstract

Executive function (EF) has been defined as a multifaceted construct that involves a variety of high-level cognitive abilities such as planning, working memory, mental flexibility, and inhibition. Being able to identify deficits in EF is important for the diagnosis and monitoring of several neurodegenerative disorders, and thus their assessment is a topic of much debate. In particular, there has been a growing interest in the development of neuropsychological screening tools that can potentially provide a reliable quick measure of EF. In this review, we critically discuss the four screening tools of EF currently available in the literature: Executive Interview-25 (EXIT 25), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), INECO Frontal Screening (IFS), and FRONTIER Executive Screen (FES). We first describe their features, and then evaluate their psychometric properties, the existing evidence on their neural correlates, and the empirical work that has been conducted in clinical populations. We conclude that the four screening tools generally present appropriate psychometric properties, and are sensitive to impairments in EF in several neurodegenerative conditions. However, more research will be needed mostly with respect to normative data and neural correlates, and to determine the extent to which these tools add specific information to the one provided by global cognition screening tests. More research directly comparing the available tools with each other will also be important to establish in which conditions each of them can be most useful.

Keywords: aging; cognitive impairment; executive functions; neurodegenerative disorders; neuropsychological assessment; neuropsychological screening; psychometric properties; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahn S., Kim S., Kim J., Kim S., Kim S., Sung J., et al. . (2011). Frontal assessment battery to evaluate frontal lobe dysfunction in ALS patients. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 38, 242–246. 10.1017/S0317167100011409 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amiéva H., Lafont S., Rouch-Leroyer I., Rainville C., Dartigues J. F., Orgogozo J. M., et al. . (2004). Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer Disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in Stroop Test. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 19, 791–803. 10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appollonio I., Leone M., Isella V., Piamarta F., Consoli T., Villa M. L., et al. . (2005). The frontal assessment battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol. Sci. 26, 108–116. 10.1007/s10072-005-0443-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ardila A. (2008). On the evolutionary origins of executive functions. Brain Cogn. 68, 92–99. 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asaadi S., Ashrafi F., Omidbeigi M., Nasiri Z., Pakdaman H., Amini-Harandi A. (2016). Persian version of frontal assessment battery: correlations with formal measures of executive functioning and providing normative data for Persian population. Iran J. Neurol. 15, 16–22. - PMC - PubMed