Risk of a first-ever acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with sulphonylurea treatment: A population-based cohort study
- PMID: 29171906
- PMCID: PMC5873381
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.13168
Risk of a first-ever acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with sulphonylurea treatment: A population-based cohort study
Abstract
We investigated the association between the current use of individual sulphonylureas and the risk of a first-ever acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause mortality, in a population-based cohort study, using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (2004-2012). New users (N = 121 869), aged ≥18 years, with at least one prescription for a non-insulin antidiabetic agent were included. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of a first-ever AMI and all-cause mortality associated with the use of individual sulphonylureas, and other non-insulin glucose-lowering drugs. No differences in risk of a first-ever AMI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.50) or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80-1.17) were observed when comparing gliclazide use with non-gliclazide sulphonylurea use. Similar results were found for each individual sulphonylurea. As evidence is accumulating that gliclazide is no safer than other sulphonylureas, current guidelines suggesting superiority should be carefully evaluated.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; all-cause mortality; sulphonylureas; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2017 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
O. K. reports receiving funding from GSK, IMI PROTECT and IMI EU2P, in addition personal fees from educational lecture on methods to control for confounding for Roche. These sources are outside of the submitted work. Other authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Comment in
-
Residual confounding in the study by van Dalem et al.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jun;20(6):1547-1548. doi: 10.1111/dom.13269. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. PMID: 29493108 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk of hypoglycaemia in users of sulphonylureas compared with metformin in relation to renal function and sulphonylurea metabolite group: population based cohort study.BMJ. 2016 Jul 13;354:i3625. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3625. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27413017 Free PMC article.
-
Association between first-line monotherapy with sulphonylurea versus metformin and risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: a retrospective, observational study.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Oct;16(10):957-62. doi: 10.1111/dom.12302. Epub 2014 May 8. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014. PMID: 24720708
-
Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non-diabetic controls.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Nov;16(11):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/dom.12354. Epub 2014 Jul 31. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014. PMID: 25041462
-
Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Drugs. 2005;65(3):385-411. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00005. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15669880 Review.
-
Do sulphonylureas still have a place in clinical practice?Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;6(10):821-832. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30025-1. Epub 2018 Feb 28. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018. PMID: 29501322 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1047-1057. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18160. Epub 2022 Dec 10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023. PMID: 36495141 Free PMC article.
-
Gliclazide monotherapy increases risks of all-cause mortality and has similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke with glimepiride monotherapy in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21236. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021236. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32702900 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Nicolucci A, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with glucose‐lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(3):313‐324. - PubMed
-
- Forst T, Hanefeld M, Jacob S, et al. Association of sulphonylurea treatment with all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013;10(4):302‐314. - PubMed
-
- Bannister CA, Holden SE, Jenkins‐Jones S, et al. Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non‐diabetic controls. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(11):1165‐1173. - PubMed
-
- Morgan CL, Mukherjee J, Jenkins‐Jones S, Holden SE, Currie CJ. Association between first‐line monotherapy with sulphonylurea versus metformin and risk of all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular events: a retrospective, observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(10):957‐962. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials