An estimation of US horse-owner/caregiver willingness-to-pay for daily use and infectious upper respiratory disease treatment options
- PMID: 29171908
- DOI: 10.1111/evj.12786
An estimation of US horse-owner/caregiver willingness-to-pay for daily use and infectious upper respiratory disease treatment options
Abstract
Background: Equine injury and disease cause two types of costs for those financially responsible for treating and caring for the infected horse(s); direct costs of treating the horse and indirect cost of lost use of the horse for a period of time to the user of the horse (daily horse use). Indirect costs are more difficult to estimate but pose significant financial implications for equine-owners/caregivers. Additionally, there exists a gap in existing research regarding the valuation of infectious treatment options in horses.
Objective: To estimate the value a US horse-owner/caregiver places on daily horse use and describe respondents' willingness-to-pay for various attributes of equine treatment options.
Study design: Online questionnaire survey.
Methods: An online questionnaire was provided to equine-owners and caretakers, and owner demographic, horse care and horse use information from respondents were requested. Additionally, respondents were presented with hypothetical disease treatment options with the following attributes: daily dosage, number of days of rest required, route of administration and out-of-pocket cost to the owner/caretaker through a choice experiment. Data were analysed using a rank-ordered logit analysis and willingness-to-pay estimates for daily use and treatment options were calculated.
Results: Results suggest that the average horse-owner with an uninsured and insured horse is willing to pay $12.07 (95% confidence interval: -$15.01, -$9.69) and $17.95 (95% confidence interval: -$25.30, -$11.20) per day to reduce lost use days required (due to need for rest) respectively. Respondents showed preferences for oral administration over treatments requiring i.m. injections.
Main limitations: As this study employed an online survey it was subjected to self-selection bias and a sample size calculation was not performed.
Conclusions: Veterinarians and pharmaceutical companies may use these results when promoting various treatment options to horse-owners/caregivers and in product development. Additionally, promotion efforts may be targeted towards equine-owners with higher daily use values (owners with insured horses).
Keywords: disease treatment preferences; horse; use values, best-worst choice experiment; willingness-to-pay.
© 2017 EVJ Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Financial strain of COVID-19 and its impact on willingness-to-pay for equine care.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skad091. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad091. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36966356 Free PMC article.
-
An online survey of horse-owners in Great Britain.BMC Vet Res. 2013 Sep 28;9:188. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-188. BMC Vet Res. 2013. PMID: 24074003 Free PMC article.
-
The accuracy of the National Equine Database in relation to vector-borne disease risk modelling of horses in Great Britain.Equine Vet J. 2013 May;45(3):302-8. doi: 10.1111/evj.12018. Epub 2013 Jan 7. Equine Vet J. 2013. PMID: 23294172
-
[Options and limitations of protecting horse husbandries in times of growing wolf populations in Germany - Review of the literature and horse owner questionnaire on risk assessment].Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2021 Oct;49(5):301-309. doi: 10.1055/a-1580-8764. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2021. PMID: 34666366 Review. German.
-
Identifying Sources of Potential Bias When Using Online Survey Data to Explore Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review.Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 22;7(3):140. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030140. Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 32971754 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous