Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 26;18(11):3087-3090.
doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.3087.

Repair Index in Examination of Nuclear Changes in the Buccal Mucosa of Smokers: A Useful Method for Screening of Oral Cancer

Sareh Farhadi  1 , Maryam Mohamadi, Mehdi Mohamadi
Affiliations

Repair Index in Examination of Nuclear Changes in the Buccal Mucosa of Smokers: A Useful Method for Screening of Oral Cancer

Sareh Farhadi et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Background: Smoking is one of the major risk factors for cancers, especially in the oral cavity. Nuclear changes occur in the early stages of cancer. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate nuclear changes and calculate a “repair index” for the buccal mucosa of smokers. Material and Methods: This historical cohort study was conducted by selecting samples including smokers and non-smokers. In addition, the smoker group were divided into 2 subgroups with a smoking history of >10 and ≤10 years. Buccal mucosa smears were obtained and Papanicolaou staining was employed to detect nuclear changes. Micronuclei, karyorrhexis and karyolysis were assessed and eventually a repair index was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test. Results: In the 60 samples studied, differences were significant in smopkers vs. nonsmokers for micronuclei, (P=0.002) but not karyorrhexis or karyolysis. (P=0.789 and P=0.578, respectively). Also, the repair index demonstrated no statistically significant variation (P=0.107). Comparison of the two subgroups of smokers demonstrated that the frequency of micronuclei in those with a history >10 years was significantly higher and the RI was significantly lower than with ≤10 years (P=0.0001 and 0.04, respectively). While karyorrhexis and karyolysis were also higher in the longer exposure individuals the differences were not significant (P=0.07 and 0.78, respectively). Conclusion: Among the nuclear changes investigated, micronuclei proved the more reliable indicator to assess the adverse effects of smoking on the oral mucosa, becoming prominent with increase in smoking history. In addition, while a “repair index” may have benefits for assessment of nuclear damage caused by smoking, further research is necessary in this field.

Keywords: Micronucleus; Karyorrhexis; Karyolysis; repair index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Karyorrhexis is Marked by an Arrow
Figure 2
Figure 2
Broken Eggs are Marked by an Arrow
Figure 3
Figure 3
Micronucleus and Karyorrhexis are Marked by an Arrow
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cytological Appearance of Normal Mucosa Related to Control Group.
Diagrams 1-4
Diagrams 1-4
Scatter Plot Diagrams Related to Mean Percentages of MN, KR, KL and BE
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Abbasi F, Farhadi S, Esmaili M. Efficacy of pilocarpine and bromhexine in improving radiotherapy-induced xerostomia. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:86–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumert JL, Ladwig KH, Ruf E, et al. Determinants of heavy cigarette smoking: are there differences in men and women?Results from the population based MONICA/KORA Augsburg surveys. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:1220–7. - PubMed
    1. Celik A, Diler SB, Eke D. Assessment of genetic damage in buccal epithelium cells of painters: micronucleus, nuclear changes, and repair index. DNA Cell Biol. 2010;29:277–84. - PubMed
    1. Celik A, Yildirim S, Ekinsi SY, Tasdelen B. Bio-monitoring for the genotoxic assessment in road construction workers as a determined by the buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;92:265–70. - PubMed
    1. Chang YC, Hu CC, Tseng TH, et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of areca nut related compounds on human buccal mucosal fibroblasts. Chin Dent J. 2000;19:95–102.