Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Nov;24(1):1762-1769.
doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1402216.

Formulation and optimization of duloxetine hydrochloride buccal films: in vitro and in vivo evaluation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Formulation and optimization of duloxetine hydrochloride buccal films: in vitro and in vivo evaluation

Amr Mostafa El Sharawy et al. Drug Deliv. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Duloxetine hydrochloride (DH) is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSNRI) indicated for the treatment of depression. Duloxetine suffers from reduced oral bioavailability (≈50%) due to hepatic metabolism. This study aims to develop DH buccoadhesive films to improve its bioavailability. DH buccoadhesive films were prepared adopting the solvent casting method using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). The prepared films were evaluated for weight uniformity, drug content, surface pH, swelling index, mucoadhesion strength and drug release percentages. Accelerated stability and bioavailability studies in healthy human volunteers were also performed for the selected films. Results of the evaluation tests showed that the optimum physicochemical characters were obtained by the films prepared with 2% HPMC using 10% propylene glycol (F2 films). Accelerated stability studies revealed that DH showed proved stability throughout the experiment time. DH bioavailability from F2 films was determined and compared with that of the marketed oral capsules (Cymbalta® 30 mg). The pharmacokinetic results showed that Cmax for F2 was higher than the market product. In addition, ANOVA analysis showed that a Tmax of F2 film was significantly lower, while, the AUC0-72 of F2 was significantly higher than that of Cymbalta capsules. The percentage relative bioavailability of DH from F2 was found to be 296.39%. Therefore, the prepared buccal films offer an alternative route for the administration of DH with the possibility of improving its bioavailability.

Keywords: Buccoadhesive films; accelerated stability; bioavailability; drug release; duloxetine hydrochloride; mucoadhesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Release profiles of DH films prepared with (A) 10% PG (F1–F8) and (B) 30% PG (F9–F16).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Release profile of DH from the freshly prepared and stored F2 films in SSF (pH 6.8).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean plasma concentration–time profiles of DH after oral administration of Cymbalta® capsules and buccal administration of F2 films to human volunteers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abha D, Sheeja K, Bhagyashri J. (2011). Design and evaluation of buccal film of diclofenac sodium. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 1:17–30.
    1. Bala R, Pawar P, Khanna S, Arora S. (2013). Orally dissolving strips: a new approach to oral drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Investig 3:67–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendas B, Schmalfuβ U, Neubert R. (1995). Influence of propylene glycol as cosolvent on mechanisms of drug transport from hydrogels. Int J Pharm 116:19–30.
    1. Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZNK, Nath RA, Banji D. (2010). Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J Adv Pharm Tech Res 1:381–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottenberg P, Cleymaet R, De Muynck C, et al. . (1991). Development and testing of bioadhesive, fluoride-containing slow-release tablets for oral use. J Pharm Pharmacol 43:457–64. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources