Employing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to support newly diagnosed patients with melanoma: Feasibility and acceptability of a holistic needs assessment intervention
- PMID: 29173828
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.10.002
Employing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to support newly diagnosed patients with melanoma: Feasibility and acceptability of a holistic needs assessment intervention
Abstract
Purpose: Living with a melanoma diagnosis can be challenging. We aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived value of a nurse-led intervention that utilised patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to identify and address the supportive care needs of newly diagnosed patients with Stage I/II melanoma over the first 4 months post-diagnosis.
Methods: We conducted an exploratory, repeated-measures, single-arm, feasibility trial. One baseline (4 weeks post-diagnosis; T1) and one follow-up intervention session (4 weeks after wide local excision; T3) took place, two months apart. Patient survey data were collected monthly, at four assessment points (T1-T4), followed by exit interviews.
Results: A recruitment rate of 55% (10/18) was achieved. The skin cancer nurse specialist (CNS) performed 19 in-clinic patient assessments within 6 months. One patient missed their follow-up intervention session (90% retention rate). Three participants (30%) were lost to follow-up at T4. Patients endorsed the standardised use of easy-to-use PRO measures as a means to help them shortlist, report and prioritise their needs. The CNS viewed the intervention as a highly structured activity that allowed tailoring support priority needs. A sizeable reduction in information needs was found from T1 to T4 (Standardised Response Mean [SRM] change = -0.99; p < 0.05). From T1 to T2, significant reductions in psychological (SRM change = -1.18; p < 0.001), practical (SRM change = -0.67; p < 0.05) and sexuality needs (SRM change = -0.78; p < 0.05) were observed.
Conclusions: The intervention appears to be feasible in clinical practice and acceptable to both patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and clinicians. Future research is warranted to test its effectiveness against standard care.
Keywords: Acceptability; Cancer nurse specialist; Feasibility; Melanoma; Patient-reported outcome measures; Supportive care needs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer.Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 15. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28720258
-
Using patient-reported outcome measures to deliver enhanced supportive care to people with lung cancer: feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led consultation model.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3729-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4234-x. Epub 2018 May 19. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29779057 Clinical Trial.
-
eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 2;19(10):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8360. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28970188 Free PMC article.
-
Care management by oncology nurses to address palliative care needs: a pilot trial to assess feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of the CONNECT intervention.J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):232-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0325. Epub 2014 Dec 17. J Palliat Med. 2015. PMID: 25517219 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation and impact of Holistic Needs Assessments for people affected by cancer: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the literature.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13087. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13087. Epub 2019 May 14. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019. PMID: 31087443
Cited by
-
Addressing cancer survivors' information needs and satisfaction: a systematic review of potential intervention components for survivors with a rare cancer type.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Oct 18;19(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03403-7. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024. PMID: 39425097 Free PMC article.
-
Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey.Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3531-3545. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03492-0. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Qual Life Res. 2023. PMID: 37522941 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review with evidence mapping of supportive care interventions for melanoma patients and caregivers.Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(12):13758-13773. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6012. Epub 2023 Apr 29. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37119042 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e20203. doi: 10.2196/20203. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32965232 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology.Qual Life Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02112-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25. Qual Life Res. 2019. PMID: 30684149