Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jan;109(1):130-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization

Joshua D Kapfhamer et al. Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length (mGSD - CRL) is associated with first-trimester pregnancy loss or adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to determine if mGSD - CRL is a better predictor of pregnancy loss than either measurement alone.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): A total of 1,243 IVF cycles with fresh or cryopreserved autologous embryo transfers resulting in singleton gestations performed at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from January 2005 through December 2014. Cycles included ultrasound measurements of mGSD and CRL at 45-56 days' gestation.

Intervention(s): Mean gestational sac diameter to crown-rump length difference.

Main outcome measure(s): Primary outcomes were first-trimester pregnancy loss and gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes were infant birth weight and pregnancy complications.

Result(s): First-trimester pregnancy loss rates were significantly higher in pregnancies with mGSD - CRL <5 mm (43.7%) compared with 5-9.99 mm (15.8%), 10-14.99 mm (9.9%), and ≥15 mm (7.1%). No correlations were found with infant birth weight, gestational age at delivery, or other pregnancy complications. mGSD - CRL was not a better predictor of pregnancy loss than mGSD or CRL alone.

Conclusion(s): There is a strong inverse relationship between mGSD - CRL and first-trimester pregnancy loss in IVF patients, although the incidence of pregnancy loss with a mGSD - CRL <5 mm was significantly lower than previously reported. Small mGSD - CRL was not associated with an increased risk of complications in pregnancies that continued beyond 20 weeks. The association between mGSD, CRL, and miscarriage is complex.

Keywords: IVF; Miscarriage; crown-rump length; gestational sac.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Pregnancy loss rates by mGSD-CRL category
P values presented are for chi-square tests, compared to the 5–9.9 mm referent population.mGSD-CRL = mean gestational sac diameter to crown-rump length difference. *P<.001;**P<.007; ***P<.018.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rowling SE, Coleman BG, Langer JE, Arger PH, Nisenbaum HL, Horii SC. First-trimester US parameters of failed pregnancy. Radiology 1997;203:211–7. - PubMed
    1. Robinson HP. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973;4:28–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Barnhart KT, Benacerraf BR et al. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1443–51. - PubMed
    1. Preisler J, Kopeika J, Ismail L, Vathanan V, Farren J, Abdallah Y et al. Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study. BMJ 2015;351:h4579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nazari A CJ, Epstein RH, Dietterich C, Farzanfar S. Relationship of small-for-dates sac size to crown-rump length and spontaneous abortion in patients with a known date of ovulation. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:369–73. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms