The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia
- PMID: 29175093
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.012
The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia
Abstract
For most people the use of visual imagery is pervasive in daily life, but for a small group of people the experience of visual imagery is entirely unknown. Research based on subjective phenomenology indicates that otherwise healthy people can completely lack the experience of visual imagery, a condition now referred to as aphantasia. As congenital aphantasia has thus far been based on subjective reports, it remains unclear whether individuals are really unable to imagine visually, or if they have very poor metacognition - they have images in their mind, but are blind to them. Here we measured sensory imagery in subjectively self-diagnosed aphantasics, using the binocular rivalry paradigm, as well as measuring their self-rated object and spatial imagery with multiple questionnaires (VVIQ, SUIS and OSIQ). Unlike, the general population, experimentally naive aphantasics showed almost no imagery-based rivalry priming. Aphantasic participants' self-rated visual object imagery was significantly below average, however their spatial imagery scores were above average. These data suggest that aphantasia is a condition involving a lack of sensory and phenomenal imagery, and not a lack of metacognition. The possible underlying neurological cause of aphantasia is discussed as well as future research directions.
Keywords: Aphantasia; Cognition; Individual differences; Mental imagery; Visual imagery.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Revisiting the blind mind: Still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia.Neurosci Res. 2024 Apr;201:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Neurosci Res. 2024. PMID: 38311033
-
Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:220-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Cortex. 2023. PMID: 37948876 Review.
-
Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:180-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24. Cortex. 2022. PMID: 35180481
-
Assessing aphantasia prevalence and the relation of self-reported imagery abilities and memory task performance.Conscious Cogn. 2023 Aug;113:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103548. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Conscious Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37451040
-
Aphantasia and involuntary imagery.Conscious Cogn. 2024 Apr;120:103679. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103679. Epub 2024 Apr 1. Conscious Cogn. 2024. PMID: 38564857 Review.
Cited by
-
A computational account of conflict processing during mental imagery.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;24(5):816-838. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01201-z. Epub 2024 Jul 31. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39085587
-
The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength.Elife. 2022 Mar 31;11:e72484. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72484. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35356890 Free PMC article.
-
Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness.Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):1848-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01364-7. Epub 2020 May 31. Psychol Res. 2021. PMID: 32476064 Free PMC article.
-
Imagine, and you will find - Lack of attentional guidance through visual imagery in aphantasics.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2486-2497. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02307-z. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021. PMID: 33880710 Free PMC article.
-
Mental imagery in animals: Learning, memory, and decision-making in the face of missing information.Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00386-5. Learn Behav. 2019. PMID: 31228005 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials