Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Published Erratum
. 2017 Dec;25(12):2156-2157.
doi: 10.1002/oby.22076. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

Erratum: The Dietary Intervention to Enhance Tracking with Mobile Devices (DIET Mobile) Study: A 6-Month Randomized Weight Loss Trial

Published Erratum

Erratum: The Dietary Intervention to Enhance Tracking with Mobile Devices (DIET Mobile) Study: A 6-Month Randomized Weight Loss Trial

Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Objective:: To examine the use of two different mobile dietary self-monitoring methods for weight loss.

Methods:: Adults with overweight (n = 81; mean BMI 34.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2) were randomized to self-monitor their diet with a mobile app (App, n = 42) or wearable Bite Counter device (Bite, n = 39). Both groups received the same behavioral weight loss information via twice-weekly podcasts. Weight, physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and energy intake (two dietary recalls) were assessed at 0, 3, and 6 months.

Results:: At 6 months, 75% of participants completed the trial. The App group lost significantly more weight (−6.8 ± 0.8 kg) than the Bite group (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg; group × time interaction: P < 0.001). Changes in energy intake (kcal/d) (−621 ± 157 App, −456 ± 167 Bite; P = 0.47) or number of days diet was tracked (90.7 ± 9.1 App, 68.4 ± 9.8 Bite; P = 0.09) did not differ between groups, but the Bite group had significant increases in physical activity metabolic equivalents (+2015.4 ± 684.6 min/wk; P = 0.02) compared to little change in the App group (−136.5 ± 630.6; P = 0.02). Total weight loss was significantly correlated with number of podcasts downloaded (r = −0.33, P < 0.01) and number of days diet was tracked (r = −0.33, P < 0.01).

Conclusions:: While frequency of diet tracking was similar between the App and Bite groups, there was greater weight loss observed in the App group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: AH and ERM have formed a company, Bite Technologies, to market and sell a bite counting device. Clemson University owns a US patent for intellectual property known as “The Weight Watch,” USA, Patent No. 8310368, filed January 2009, granted November 13, 2012. Bite Technologies has licensed the method from Clemson University. AH and ERM receive royalty payments from bite counting device sales. The other authors declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DIET Mobile CONSORT flow diagram.

Erratum for

References

    1. Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2011;34:841–859. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc 2011;111:92–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke LE, Swigart V, Warziski Turk M, Derro N, Ewing LJ. Experiences of self-monitoring: successes and struggles during treatment for weight loss. Qual Health Res 2009;19:815–828. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas JG, Bond DS. Review of innovations in digital health technology to promote weight control. Curr Diab Rep 2014;14:485. doi:10.1007/s11892-014-0485-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turner-McGrievy GM, Beets MW, Moore JB, Kaczynski AT, Barr-Anderson DJ, Tate DF. Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:513–518. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources