Dynamic Electronic Health Record Note Prototype: Seeing More by Showing Less
- PMID: 29180544
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170028
Dynamic Electronic Health Record Note Prototype: Seeing More by Showing Less
Abstract
Introduction: Cluttered documentation may contribute adversely to physician readers' cognitive load, inadvertently obscuring high-value information with less valuable information. We test the hypothesis that a novel, collapsible assessment, plan, subjective, objective (APSO) note design would be faster, more accurate, and more satisfying to use than a conventional electronic health record (EHR) subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) note for finding information needed for ambulatory chronic disease care.
Methods: We iteratively developed physician clinic note prototypes with features designed to emphasize more important information and de-emphasize less clinically relevant information. Sixteen primary care physicians reviewed comparable clinic notes with the 4 note styles presented in random order to find key information in the notes during timed tasks. The 4 note styles were denoted A (traditional SOAP note), B (2-column APSO note), C (collapsible APSO note), and D (2-column collapsible APSO note). The 4 unique note styles were designed to have equal amounts of information in each section. We simulated their utility for clinical practice by imposing time limits and by interrupting 1 of the tasks with a typical clinical interruption. For each session, we recorded audio, computer-screen activity, eye tracking, and made field notes. We obtained usability ratings (System Usability Scale), new feature preference ratings, and performed semistructured post-task interviews with subsequent content analysis. We compared the effectiveness of the 4 note styles by measuring time on task, task success (accuracy), and effort as measured by NASA Task Load Index.
Results: Note styles C and D were significantly faster than A and B for the Review of Systems and Physical Examination tasks, as we expected. Notes B and C had the best success (finding requested data) scores. Users strongly endorsed all the new note features incorporated into the new note prototypes. Previously expressed concerns about temporarily hiding parts of the note (using the accordion display design pattern) were allayed. Usability ratings for note A were worst but comparably better for note styles B, C, and D.
Discussion: The new APSO note prototypes performed better than the traditional SOAP note format for speed, task success (accuracy), and usability for physician users acquiring information needed for a typical chronic disease visit in primary care. Moving Assessment and Plan to the top is 1 easily accomplished feature change. Innovative documentation displays of EHR data can safely improve information display without eliminating data from the record of the visit.
Keywords: Data Display; Documentation; Electronic Health Records; Information Systems; Medical Informatics.
© Copyright 2017 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Similar articles
-
Physician Information Needs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Time to Reengineer the Clinic Note.J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):316-23. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140244. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 25957364
-
A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Int J Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27103191 Free PMC article.
-
Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display.Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Feb 26;5(1):169-90. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064. eCollection 2014. Appl Clin Inform. 2014. PMID: 24734131 Free PMC article.
-
The essential SOAP note in an EHR age.Nurse Pract. 2016 Feb 18;41(2):29-36. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000476377.35114.d7. Nurse Pract. 2016. PMID: 26795838 Review.
-
Clinicians' reasoning as reflected in electronic clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):172-184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy155. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30576561 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Clinician Experience Reviewing Electronic Progress Notes.Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):446-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692164. Epub 2019 Jun 19. Appl Clin Inform. 2019. PMID: 31216591 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems.J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1403-1416. doi: 10.1111/jep.13582. Epub 2021 May 13. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 33982356 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Feasibility of a Software Prototype Supporting the Management of Multimorbid Seniors: Mixed Methods Study in General Practices.JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Jul 4;6(3):e12695. doi: 10.2196/12695. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019. PMID: 31274115 Free PMC article.
-
Disappearing Help Text: Implementing a Note-Based Tool for In-Line Clinical Decision Support and Note Bloat Reduction.Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1033-1039. doi: 10.1055/a-1934-8323. Epub 2022 Aug 31. Appl Clin Inform. 2022. PMID: 36044925 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of staff experiences of the Royal Literary Fund writer-in-residence service to support improvements in written communication in healthcare.Qual Res Med Healthc. 2023 Dec 29;7(3):11601. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2023.11601. eCollection 2023 Dec 4. Qual Res Med Healthc. 2023. PMID: 38213668 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources