Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
- PMID: 29180591
- PMCID: PMC5719294
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016155
Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
Abstract
Objectives: To develop outcome measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience.
Design: Mixed methods, including qualitative interviews and data extraction from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Setting: Two university-teaching NHS hospitals and three district NHS hospitals in the South West and Midlands regions of England.
Participants: Sixty-four patients and 15 healthcare professionals from abdominal general surgical specialities and obstetrics (caesarean section).
Methods: Measures were developed according to standard guidelines to identify issues relevant to patients' experiences of surgical wounds and dressings, including analysis of existing RCT outcomes and semi-structured interviews. These were written into provisional questionnaire items for a single outcome measure. Cognitive interviews with patients and healthcare professionals assessed face validity, acceptability and relevance. Findings from interviews were regularly shared with the study team who suggested amendments to modify and reword items to improve understanding before further iterative testing with patients and healthcare professionals.
Results: Analyses of existing RCT outcomes and interviews produced a total of 69 issues. Pretesting and iterative revision established the need for two separate measures. One measure addresses healthcare professionals' experience of wound management in two key areas: exudate and its impact, and allergic reactions to the dressing. The other measure addresses patients' experience of wounds in seven key areas: wound comfort, dressing removal, dressings to protect the wound, impact on daily activities, ease of movement, anxiety about the wound and satisfaction with dressing. Each measure took less than five min to complete and both were understood and acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals.
Conclusion: This in-depth study has developed two measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. Further work to test their validity, reliability and application to other settings is now required.
Trial registration number: HTA - 12/200/04; Pre-results.
Keywords: dressings; qualitative research; questionnaire development; wounds.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31392958 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5(5):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 15;6:CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6. PMID: 32356396 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Bluebelle study (phase A): a mixed-methods feasibility study to inform an RCT of surgical wound dressing strategies.BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 22;6(9):e012635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012635. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27660321 Free PMC article.
-
Dressing use issues in primary abdominal wounds: a qualitative study of health staff and patient views.Br J Nurs. 2019 Nov 14;28(20):S10-S18. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.20.S10. Br J Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31714826
-
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 15;6(6):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4:CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7. PMID: 32542647 Free PMC article. Updated.
Cited by
-
A randomized controlled trial on the effect of a silver carboxymethylcellulose dressing on surgical site infections after breast cancer surgery.PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195715. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29791437 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of Telephone Administration of an adapted wound heaLing QuestiONnaire for assessment for surgical site infection following abdominal surgery in low and middle-income countries (TALON): protocol for a study within a trial (SWAT).Trials. 2021 Jul 21;22(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05398-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34289893 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' experiences with the application of medical adhesives to the skin: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e089773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089773. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39486825 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported experience measures are essential to improving quality of care for chronic wounds: An international qualitative study.Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13374. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Int Wound J. 2020. PMID: 32320141 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation of the Wound Healing Questionnaire universal-reporter outcome measure for use in global surgery trials (TALON-1 study): mixed-methods study and Rasch analysis.Br J Surg. 2023 May 16;110(6):685-700. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad058. Br J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37005373 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical