Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Nov 26;7(11):e017495.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017495.

Referrers' point of view on the referral process to neurosurgery and opinions on neurosurgeons: a large-scale regional survey in the UK

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Referrers' point of view on the referral process to neurosurgery and opinions on neurosurgeons: a large-scale regional survey in the UK

Meriem Amarouche et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: There is an increased reliance on online referral systems (ORS) within neurosurgical departments across the UK. Opinions of neurosurgeons on ORS are extensively reported but those of referrers have hardly been sought. Our study aims at ascertaining our referring colleagues' views on our ORS and its impact on patient care, their opinions on neurosurgeons and how to improve our referral process.

Setting: 14 district general hospitals and one teaching hospital.

Participants: 641 healthcare professionals across a range of medical and surgical specialties including doctors of all grades, nurses and physiotherapists. Survey responses were obtained by medical students using a smartphone application.

Results: Although 92% of respondents were aware of the ORS, 74% would routinely phone the on-call registrar either before or after making referrals online. The majority (44%) believed their call to relate to a life-threatening emergency. 62% of referrers considered the ORS helpful in informing patients' care and 48% had a positive opinion of their interaction with neurosurgical registrars. On ways to improve the ORS, 50% selected email/text confirmation of response sent to referrers and 16% to referring consultants.

Conclusion: Our results confirm that referrers feel that using our ORS positively impacts patient care but that it remains in need of improvement in order to better suit our colleagues' needs when it comes to managing neurosurgical patients. We feel that the promotion of neurosurgical education and mitigation of the effects of adverse workplace human factors are likely to achieve the common goal of neurosurgeons and referrers alike: a high standard in patient care.

Keywords: neurosurgery; referrals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grades of the 74% of referrers who continue to phone the on-call registrar before or after making an online referral. F1/F2, Foundation Year 1/2; SHO, Senior House Officer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Opinion of referrers by grade on the effect of the online referral system on patient care based on the answers provided to the statement: “Referring my patient to neurosurgery via the online referral system changed/informed their management plan”. F1/F2, Foundation Year 1/2; SHO, Senior House Officer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Opinion of referrers by grade on their interaction with our on-call neurosurgery registrars based on the answers provided to the statement “The neurosurgery registrar I spoke to on the phone was polite and helpful”. F1/F2, Foundation Year 1/2; SHO, Senior House Officer.

References

    1. Lee RS, Woods R, Bullard M, et al. . Consultations in the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature. Emerg Med J 2008;25:4–9. 10.1136/emj.2007.051631 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reid C, Moorthy C, Forshaw K. Referral patterns: an audit into referral practice among doctors in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 2005;22:355–8. 10.1136/emj.2003.008409 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croft SJ, Barnes J, Ginnis C, et al. . An evaluation of the referral process in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2014;31:827–32. 10.1136/emermed-2013-202532 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woods RA, Lee R, Ospina MB, et al. . Consultation outcomes in the emergency department: exploring rates and complexity. CJEM 2008;10:25–31. 10.1017/S1481803500009970 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu RC, Tran K, Lo V, et al. . Effects of clinical communication interventions in hospitals: a systematic review of information and communication technology adoptions for improved communication between clinicians. Int J Med Inform 2012;81:723–32. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.014 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources