Clinical Implication of Mycophenolic Acid Trough Concentration Monitoring in Kidney Transplant Patients on a Tacrolimus Triple Maintenance Regimen: A Single-Center Experience
- PMID: 29180612
- PMCID: PMC6248041
- DOI: 10.12659/aot.906041
Clinical Implication of Mycophenolic Acid Trough Concentration Monitoring in Kidney Transplant Patients on a Tacrolimus Triple Maintenance Regimen: A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to analyze the clinical implications of mycophenolic acid trough concentration monitoring. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected data of patients with mycophenolic acid trough concentration monitoring after their first kidney transplant between November 2006 and March 2015 who were prescribed tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone. Analyses were performed on 3 periods: 1 month, 1 month to 1 year, and after 1 year post-transplantation. To analyze factors related to acute cellular rejection, logistic regression was used for 1 month, while Cox analysis was used during 1 month to 1 year and after 1 year post-transplantation. RESULTS In the 145 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil, mean tacrolimus trough ≥7.0 ng/mL (OR=0.177, CI=0.060-0.524, p=0.002) and mean mycophenolic acid trough ≥1.7 mg/L (OR=0.190, CI=0.040-0.896, p=0.036) were protective for rejection during 1 month. Mean mycophenolic acid trough ≥1.7 mg/L (HR=0.179, CI=0.040-0.806, p=0.025) and ≥0.7 mg/L (HR=0.142, CI=0.028-0.729, p=0.019) were related to better rejection-free survival during 1 month to 1 year and after 1 year, respectively. In 399 patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium, mean tacrolimus trough ≥7.0 ng/mL (OR=0.258, CI=0.131-0.507, p<0.001) and mean mycophenolic acid trough ≥2.1 mg/L (OR=0.507, CI=0.264-0.973, p=0.041) were protective for rejection during 1 month. Mean mycophenolic acid trough ≥1.7 mg/L (HR=0.519, CI=0.289-0.932, p=0.028) and ≥0.7 mg/L (HR=0.208, CI=0.072-0.602, p=0.004) were related to better rejection-free survival during 1 month to 1 year and after 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Mycophenolic acid trough concentration monitoring can be useful in preventing acute cellular rejection in patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures



Similar articles
-
A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring.Transplantation. 2005 Aug 27;80(4):457-65. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000165847.05787.08. Transplantation. 2005. PMID: 16123718 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.Transplantation. 2004 Jan 27;77(2):244-51. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101290.20629.DC. Transplantation. 2004. PMID: 14742989 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes in African American kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppression.Transplantation. 2013 Feb 27;95(4):566-72. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318277438f. Transplantation. 2013. PMID: 23423268
-
Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and outcome investigations as the basis for mycophenolic acid therapeutic drug monitoring in renal and heart transplant patients.Clin Biochem. 2001 Feb;34(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(00)00184-3. Clin Biochem. 2001. PMID: 11239510 Review.
-
Long-Term Immunosuppression Management: Opportunities and Uncertainties.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Aug;16(8):1264-1271. doi: 10.2215/CJN.15040920. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33853841 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacodynamic assessment of mycophenolic acid in resting and activated target cell population during the first year after renal transplantation.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;86(6):1100-1112. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14218. Epub 2020 Feb 16. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 31925806 Free PMC article.
-
Mycophenolic Acid Trough Concentration and Dose Are Associated with Hematologic Abnormalities but Not Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 22;35(24):e185. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e185. J Korean Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32567256 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of the reduced fixed dose of mycophenolate mofetil confirmed via therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant recipients.Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jan;44(1):200-209. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.274. Epub 2024 Oct 24. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 39445344 Free PMC article.
-
Oral antibiotics lower mycophenolate mofetil drug exposure, possibly by interfering with the enterohepatic recirculation: A case series.Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Jun;11(3):e01103. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1103. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023. PMID: 37222485 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Staatz CE, Tett SE. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:13–58. - PubMed
-
- Arns W, Breuer S, Choudhury S, et al. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium delivers bioequivalent MPA exposure compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Transplant. 2005;19:199–206. - PubMed
-
- Bullingham RE, Nicholls AJ, Kamm BR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34:429–55. - PubMed
-
- Knight SR, Morris PJ. Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review. Transplantation. 2008;85:1675–85. - PubMed
-
- Hale MD, Nicholls AJ, Bullingham RE, et al. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;64:672–83. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical