Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;2(2):244-258.
doi: 10.1373/jalm.2017.023762.

Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reducing Patient Misidentification Due to Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: LMBP™ Systematic Review

Paramjit Sandhu  1 , Kakali Bandyopadhyay  2 , Dennis J Ernst  3 , William Hunt  4 , Thomas H Taylor Jr  5 , Rebecca Birch  6 , John Krolak  1 , Sharon Geaghan  7
Affiliations

Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reducing Patient Misidentification Due to Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: LMBP™ Systematic Review

Paramjit Sandhu et al. J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Specimen labeling errors have long plagued the laboratory industry putting patients at risk of transfusion-related death, medication errors, misdiagnosis, and patient mismanagement. Many interventions have been implemented and deemed to be effective in reducing sample error rates. The objective of this review was to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory practices/ interventions to develop evidence based recommendations for the best laboratory practices to reduce labeling errors.

Content: The standardized LMBP™ A-6 methods were used to conduct this systematic review. Total evidence included 12 studies published during the time periods of 1980 to September 2015. Combined data from seven studies found that the interventions developed as a result of improved communication and collaboration between the laboratory and clinical staff resulted in substantial decrease in specimen labeling errors (Median relative percent change in labeling errors: -75.86; IQI: -84.77, -58.00). Further data from subset of four studies showed a significant decrease in specimen labeling errors after the institution of the standardized specimen labeling protocols (Median relative percent decrease in specimen labeling errors: -72.45; IQI: -83.25, -46.50).

Summary: Based on the evidence included in this review, the interventions that enhance the communication and collaboration between laboratory and healthcare professionals can decrease the specimen identification errors in healthcare settings. However, more research is needed to make the conclusion on the effectiveness of other evaluated practices in this review including training and education of the specimen collection staff, audit and feedback of labeling errors, and implementation of new technology (other than barcoding).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytic Framework
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient Misidentification due to Specimen Labeling Errors Review Search Flow Diagram
Figure 3
Figure 3
Improved communication and collaboration between laboratory and healthcare professionals: Formation of Multidisciplinary Teams
Figure 4
Figure 4
Improved communication and collaboration between laboratory and healthcare professionals: Development of Standardized Policies and Practices
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relative Percent Point Change in Specimen Labeling Erros Due To Educational and Training Interventions
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relative Percent Point Change in Specimen Lebeling Errors Due Audit and Feedback Interventions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ford Catching ID errors where it counts---in the lab. CAP Today. 2005;19(9):34–40.
    1. Sauer DMC, Boshkov L. Errors in transfusion medicine. Lab Med. 2001;4(32):205–7. 4(32):205-7. 2001;4(32):205-7.
    1. Jones BA, Calam RR, Howanitz PJ. Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(1):19–26. - PubMed
    1. Dale JC, Novis DA. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(4):416–9. - PubMed
    1. Ford Disabling mislabeling---solutions for blood banks. CAP Today. 29(11):62–64. 2009;23(1):5-8.