Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jan 2;168(1):1-9.
doi: 10.7326/M17-0548. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts

Lurdes Y T Inoue et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly accepted for managing low-risk prostate cancer, yet there is no consensus about implementation. This lack of consensus is due in part to uncertainty about risks for disease progression, which have not been systematically compared or integrated across AS studies with variable surveillance protocols and dropout to active treatment.

Objective: To compare risks for upgrading from a Gleason score (GS) of 6 or less to 7 or more across AS studies after accounting for differences in surveillance intervals and competing treatments and to evaluate tradeoffs of more versus less frequent biopsies.

Design: Joint statistical model of longitudinal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and risks for biopsy upgrading.

Setting: Johns Hopkins University (JHU); Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS); University of California, San Francisco (UCSF); and University of Toronto (UT) AS studies.

Patients: 2576 men aged 40 to 80 years with a GS between 2 and 6 and clinical stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer enrolled between 1995 and 2014.

Measurements: PSA levels and biopsy GSs.

Results: After variable surveillance intervals and competing treatments were accounted for, estimated risks for biopsy upgrading were similar in the PASS and UT studies but higher in UCSF and lower in JHU studies. All cohorts had a delay of 3 to 5 months in detecting upgrading with biennial biopsies starting after a first confirmatory biopsy versus annual biopsies.

Limitation: The model does not account for possible misclassification of biopsy GS.

Conclusion: Men in different AS studies have different risks for biopsy upgrading after variable surveillance protocols and competing treatments are accounted for. Despite these differences, the consequences of more versus less frequent biopsies seem to be similar across cohorts. Biennial biopsies seem to be an acceptable alternative to annual biopsies.

Primary funding source: National Cancer Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Empirical cumulative incidence of biopsy upgrading and competing treatments across active surveillance studies after applying exclusions to yield more comparable patient characteristics across cohorts (Appendix 1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model-based cumulative probabilities of biopsy upgrading and competing treatments (each in the absence of the other) by cohort. For each curve, we assume baseline PSA and PSA velocity fixed at cohort-specific mean values. Estimates accommodate interval censoring for biopsy upgrading between the last negative and first positive biopsy.

Comment in

References

    1. Tosoian JJ, Carter HB, Lepor A, Loeb S. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(4):205–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen RC, Rumble RB, Jain S. Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement Summary. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12(3):267–9. - PubMed
    1. Newcomb LF, Thompson IM, Jr, Boyer HD, Brooks JD, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, et al. Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort. J Urol. 2016;195(2):313–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Wolf S, Trock BJ, et al. Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3379–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, Jethava V, Zhang L, Jain S, et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):272–7. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances