Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb 1:121:337-347.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.101. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Effect of snack-food proximity on intake in general population samples with higher and lower cognitive resource

Jennifer A Hunter  1 , Gareth J Hollands  2 , Dominique-Laurent Couturier  3 , Theresa M Marteau  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of snack-food proximity on intake in general population samples with higher and lower cognitive resource

Jennifer A Hunter et al. Appetite. .

Abstract

Objective: Placing snack-food further away from people consistently decreases its consumption ("proximity effect"). However, given diet-related health inequalities, it is important to know whether interventions that alter food proximity have potential to change behaviour regardless of cognitive resource (capacity for self-control). This is often lower in those in lower socio-economic positions, who also tend to have less healthy diet-related behaviours. Study 1 aims to replicate the proximity effect in a general population sample and estimate whether trait-level cognitive resource moderates the effect. In a stronger test, Study 2 investigates whether the effect is similar regardless of manipulated state-level cognitive resource.

Method: Participants were recruited into two laboratory studies (Study 1: n = 159; Study 2: n = 246). A bowl of an unhealthy snack was positioned near (20 cm) or far (70 cm) from the participant, as randomised. In Study 2, participants were further randomised to a cognitive load intervention. The pre-specified primary outcome was the proportion of participants taking any of the snack.

Results: Significantly fewer participants took the snack when far compared with near in Study 2 (57.7% vs 70.7%, β = -1.63, p = 0.020), but not in Study 1 (53.8% vs 63.3%, X2 = 1.12, p = 0.289). Removing participants who moved the bowl (i.e. who did not adhere to protocol), increased the effect-sizes: Study 1: 39.3% vs 63.9%, X2 = 6.43, p = 0.011; Study 2: 56.0% vs 73.9%, β = -2.46, p = 0.003. Effects were not moderated by cognitive resource.

Conclusions: These studies provide the most robust evidence to date that placing food further away reduces likelihood of consumption in general population samples, an effect unlikely to be moderated by cognitive resource. This indicates potential for interventions altering food proximity to contribute to addressing health inequalities, but requires testing in real-world settings.

Trial registration: Both studies were registered with ISRCTN (Study 1 reference no.: ISRCTN46995850, Study 2 reference no.: ISRCTN14239872).

Keywords: Cognitive resource; Education level; Intervention; Proximity effect; Snack-food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of the testing room.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Snack presentation in each distance condition.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Snack presentation in each distance condition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Al Hazzouri A.Z., Elfassy T., Sidney S., Jacobs D., Yaffe K. Sustained economic hardship and cognitive Function: The coronary artery risk development in young adults study. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2017;52(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arffa S. The relationship of intelligence to executive function and non-executive function measures in a sample of average, above average, and gifted youth. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2007;22(8):969–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baskin E., Gorlin M., Chance Z., Novemsky N., Dhar R., Huskey K. Proximity of snacks to beverages increases food consumption in the workplace: A field study. Appetite. 2016;103:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp A., Backholer K., Magliano D., Peeters A. The effect of obesity prevention interventions according to socioeconomic position: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 2014;15(7):541–554. - PubMed
    1. Beglinger L.J., Gaydos B., Tangphao-Daniels O., Duff K., Kareken D.A., Crawford J.…Siemers E.R. Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2005;20(4):517–529. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources