Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb;41(2):348-355.
doi: 10.2337/dc17-1638. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Modulation of GLP-1 Levels by a Genetic Variant That Regulates the Cardiovascular Effects of Intensive Glycemic Control in ACCORD

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Modulation of GLP-1 Levels by a Genetic Variant That Regulates the Cardiovascular Effects of Intensive Glycemic Control in ACCORD

Hetal S Shah et al. Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: A genome-wide association study in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial identified two markers (rs57922 and rs9299870) that were significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality during intensive glycemic control and could potentially be used, when combined into a genetic risk score (GRS), to identify patients with diabetes likely to derive benefit from intensive control rather than harm. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the pathways involved in the modulatory effect of these variants.

Research design and methods: Fasting levels of 65 biomarkers were measured at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up in the ACCORD-Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) MRI substudy (n = 562). Using linear regression models, we tested the association of the GRS with baseline and 12-month biomarker levels, and with their difference (Δ), among white subjects, with genotype data (n = 351) stratified by intervention arm.

Results: A significant association was observed between GRS and ΔGLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1, active) in the intensive arm (P = 3 × 10-4). This effect was driven by rs57922 (P = 5 × 10-4). C/C homozygotes, who had been found to derive cardiovascular benefits from intensive treatment, showed a 22% increase in GLP-1 levels during follow-up. By contrast, T/T homozygotes, who had been found to experience increased cardiac mortality with intensive treatment, showed a 28% reduction in GLP-1 levels. No association between ΔGLP-1 and GRS or rs57922 was observed in the standard treatment arm.

Conclusions: Differences in GLP-1 axis activation may mediate the modulatory effect of variant rs57922 on the cardiovascular response to intensive glycemic control. These findings highlight the importance of GLP-1 as a cardioprotective factor.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000620.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A and B: Baseline and 12-month GLP-1 levels within glycemic treatment arms and genotypes of rs57922 and rs9299870. LS means of GLP-1 obtained from model adjusted by trial covariates, clinical center network, and source of genetic data. P values are obtained from generalized linear regression for association with baseline or 12-month GLP-1 levels, using additive model of SNP, and adjusted for trial covariates, clinical center network, and source of genetic data. 12mths, 12 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A and B: Mean change in GLP-1 from baseline to 12 months within glycemic treatment arms and rs57922 genotypes. Twelve-month–to–baseline GLP-1 ratio derived from the difference (Δ) between the log-transformed baseline and 12-month GLP-1 levels; here, presented within intensive/standard glycemic treatment arms, are LS means of this ratio (from model adjusted for trial covariates, clinical center network, and source of genetic data) within genotypes of rs57922 on 5q13 (A) and rs9299870 on 10q23 (B). P values are obtained from generalized linear regression for association with ΔGLP-1 levels, using additive model of SNP, and adjusted for trial covariates, clinical center network, and source of genetic data. 12mth, 12-month.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7th ed. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation, 2015
    1. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al.; Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group . Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–2559 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah HS, Gao H, Morieri ML, et al. Genetic predictors of cardiovascular mortality during intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: findings from the ACCORD clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1915–1924 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samaropoulos XF, Light L, Ambrosius WT, Marcovina SM, Probstfield J, Goff DC Jr. The effect of intensive risk factor management in type 2 diabetes on inflammatory biomarkers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;95:389–398 - PubMed
    1. Sandoval DA, D’Alessio DA. Physiology of proglucagon peptides: role of glucagon and GLP-1 in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2015;95:513–548 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data