Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 1;44(1):110-125.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx144.

Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Diabetes Management Intervention for Delivery in Community Settings: Findings From a Pilot Randomized Effectiveness Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Diabetes Management Intervention for Delivery in Community Settings: Findings From a Pilot Randomized Effectiveness Trial

Deborah A Ellis et al. J Pediatr Psychol. .

Abstract

Objective: To adapt an evidence-based intervention targeting diabetes management in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes for use in a community setting by community health workers (CHWs) and to conduct pilot testing of the new intervention, REACH for Control (RFC). The study was conducted as a collaboration between university researchers and a federally qualified health center. Methods In a pilot effectiveness trial, feasibility and acceptability of RFC were evaluated based on participant enrollment, treatment dose, and consumer satisfaction. RFC effects on adolescent adherence, health outcomes, and quality of life were also assessed. The trial used a parallel group design. Families were randomized to 6 months of RFC plus standard medical care (n = 26) or standard care (SC) only (n = 24). Data were collected at baseline and 7-month posttest. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze data.

Results: Qualitative analyses suggested that caregivers viewed RFC and delivery of a home-based intervention by CHWs positively. Furthermore, adolescents who received RFC had statistically significant (p = .05) and clinically meaningful improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (0.7%) and reported significant improvements in quality of life from baseline to follow-up (p = .001). No significant changes were found for adolescents in standard medical care. However, while dose of primary intervention session delivered was acceptable, dose of follow-up sessions used for skills practice was low.

Conclusions: Results provide preliminary support for RFC's acceptability and effectiveness to improve health status and quality of life when used in community settings serving high-risk, low-income families. Additional testing in a full-scale effectiveness trial appears warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of RFC treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CONSORT flow diagram.

References

    1. Abualula N. A., Jacobsen K. H., Milligan R. A., Rodan M. F., Conn V. S. (2016). Evaluating diabetes educational interventions with a skill development component in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review focusing on quality of life. The Diabetes Educator, 42, 515–528. - PubMed
    1. Adler N. E., Epel E. S., Castellazzo G., Ickovics J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586.. - PubMed
    1. American Association of Diabetes Educators. (2003). Position statement: Diabetes community health workers. Diabetes Educator, 29, 818–823. 10.1177/014572170302900511 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berwick D. M. (2003). Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA, 289, 1969–1975. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bethell C. D., Newacheck P. W., Fine A., Strickland B. B., Antonelli R. C., Wilhelm C. L., Honberg L. E., Wells N. (2014). Optimizing health and health care systems for children with special health care needs using the life course perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 467–477. - PubMed

Publication types