On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation: Multiple Perspectives on Mediation Analysis
- PMID: 29187828
- PMCID: PMC5694788
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01984
On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation: Multiple Perspectives on Mediation Analysis
Abstract
Mediation analysis has become a very popular approach in psychology, and it is one that is associated with multiple perspectives that are often at odds, often implicitly. Explicitly discussing these perspectives and their motivations, advantages, and disadvantages can help to provide clarity to conversations and research regarding the use and refinement of mediation models. We discuss five such pairs of perspectives on mediation analysis, their associated advantages and disadvantages, and their implications: with vs. without a mediation hypothesis, specific effects vs. a global model, directness vs. indirectness of causation, effect size vs. null hypothesis testing, and hypothesized vs. alternative explanations. Discussion of the perspectives is facilitated by a small simulation study. Some philosophical and linguistic considerations are briefly discussed, as well as some other perspectives we do not develop here.
Keywords: causation; direct effect; indirect effect; mediation; total effect.
Figures
References
-
- Brady H. E. (2008). Causation and Explanation in Social Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
- Brockwell P. J., Davis R. A. (2013). Time Series: Theory and Methods. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
