Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 1:9:ecurrents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2.
doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2.

What Do We Mean by 'Community Resilience'? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature

Affiliations

What Do We Mean by 'Community Resilience'? A Systematic Literature Review of How It Is Defined in the Literature

Sonny S Patel et al. PLoS Curr. .

Abstract

Background: Government, industry and charitable organisations have an increasing focus on programs intended to support community resilience to disasters. But has consensus been reached as to what defines 'community resilience' and what its core characteristics are?

Methods: We undertook a systematic literature review of definitions of community resilience related to disasters. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of the definitions and descriptions that we identified, in order to determine the proposed characteristics of community resilience prior to, during and after a disaster.

Results: We identified 80 relevant papers. There was no evidence of a common, agreed definition of community resilience. In spite of this, evidence was found of nine core elements of community resilience that were common among the definitions. The core elements were: local knowledge, community networks and relationships, communication, health, governance and leadership, resources, economic investment, preparedness, and mental outlook. Within these core elements, we identified 19 sub-elements linked to community resilience.

Conclusion: Our findings show that community resilience remains an amorphous concept that is understood and applied differently by different research groups. Yet in spite of the differences in conception and application, there are well-understood elements that are widely proposed as important for a resilient community. A focus on these individual elements may be more productive than attempting to define and study community resilience as a distinct concept.

Keywords: Public Health; Resiliency; community resilience; disaster; emergency response; extreme events; governance; policy; preparedness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Flow diagram of selection process
Flow diagram of selection process
This figure shows the method of selecting a publication to be reviewed. The numbers related to the first search with publication cutoff date of October 2013 for scientific peer-reviewed articles and January 2014 for grey-literature are listed with n1, and n2 is numbers related to the second search with publication cutoff date of May 2015. The overall numbers are listed as ntotal.

References

    1. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R. Annual disaster statistical review 2012: The numbers and trends. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters; 2013.
    1. Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S. Annual disaster statistical review 2011: The numbers and trends. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters; 2012.
    1. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R. Annual disaster statistical review 2014: The numbers and trends. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters; 2015.
    1. Public Safety Canada. 72 hours: Is your family prepared? Your emergency preparedness guide. In: Canada PS, editor. Ottawa, Canada: Government of Canada; 2012.
    1. New Hampshire Government. Emergency preparedness resources and tools to help you take action and be safe! 2015 [Available from: http://www.readynh.gov/index.htm.]