Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):98-100.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3561.

Assessment of Symptom Network Density as a Prognostic Marker of Treatment Response in Adolescent Depression

Affiliations

Assessment of Symptom Network Density as a Prognostic Marker of Treatment Response in Adolescent Depression

Lizanne Schweren et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Abstract

This cohort study uses the 33-item Mood and Feelings Questionnaire to examine whether symptom network density is associated with treatment response in adolescent depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Goodyer reported serving as a paid consultant for Lundbeck and licensing the Brief Psychosocial Intervention to Lundbeck for use in a clinical trial. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Network Structures of Depressive Symptoms in 233 Relatively Good and 232 Poor Responders to Treatment
Blue lines represent positive connections; red lines, negative connections; and thicker lines, stronger connections. For the symptom (node) abbreviations, agi indicates psychomotor agitation; con, concentration problems; dep, feeling sad/depressed; ene, loss of energy; gui, guilt/worthlessness; hyp, hypersomnia; ins, insomnia; int, loss of interest/pleasure; ret, psychomotor retardation; sui, suicidal ideation; and wap, weight or appetite change.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Differences in Total Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) Mean Score, SD of the Mean Score, and Node Strength by Symptom Between Good and Poor Responders to Treatment
Red boxes outline statistically significant differences. Symptom (node) abbreviations are defined in the caption to Figure 1.

References

    1. Goodyer IM, Reynolds S, Barrett B, et al. . Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(2):109-119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsen TS, Eisemann M, Kvernmo S. Predictors and moderators of outcome in child and adolescent anxiety and depression: a systematic review of psychological treatment studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;22(2):69-87. - PubMed
    1. van Borkulo C, Boschloo L, Borsboom D, Penninx BWJH, Waldorp LJ, Schoevers RA. Association of symptom network structure with the course of [corrected] depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(12):1219-1226. - PubMed
    1. Daviss WB, Birmaher B, Melhem NA, Axelson DA, Michaels SM, Brent DA. Criterion validity of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire for depressive episodes in clinic and non-clinic subjects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(9):927-934. - PubMed
    1. Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. Qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Soft. 2012;48(4):1-18.

Publication types