Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;21(10):1259-1267.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0906-3.

Late-Life Body Mass Index, Rapid Weight Loss, Apolipoprotein E ε4 and the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia

Affiliations

Late-Life Body Mass Index, Rapid Weight Loss, Apolipoprotein E ε4 and the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia

S P Bell et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect of late-life body mass index (BMI) and rapid weight loss on incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Setting: National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set, including 34 past and current National Institute on Aging-funded AD Centers across the United States.

Participants: 6940 older adults (n=5061 normal cognition [NC]; n=1879 MCI).

Measurements: BMI (kg/m2) and modified Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP) score (sex, age, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertension medication, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, prevalent cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation) were assessed at baseline. Cognition and weight were assessed annually.

Results: Multivariable binary logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, length of follow-up, and modified FSRP related late-life BMI to risk of diagnostic conversion from NC to MCI or AD and from MCI to AD. Secondary analyses related late-life BMI to diagnostic conversion in the presence of rapid weight loss (>5% decrease in 12 months) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4. During a mean 3.8-year follow-up period, 12% of NC participants converted to MCI or AD and 49% of MCI participants converted to AD. Higher baseline BMI was associated with a reduced probability of diagnostic conversion, such that for each one-unit increase in baseline BMI there was a reduction in diagnostic conversion for both NC (OR=0.977, 95%CI 0.958-0.996, p=0.015) and MCI participants (OR=0.962, 95%CI 0.942-0.983, p<0.001). The protective effect of higher baseline BMI did not persist in the setting of rapid weight loss but did persist when adjusting for APOE ε4.

Conclusions: Higher late-life BMI is associated with a lower risk of incident MCI and AD but is not protective in the presence of rapid weight loss.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Dementia; body mass index; cognition; frailty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None for all authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram displaying derivation of study sample for primary and secondary analyses with source of exclusion. MCI=Mild Cognitive Impairment, Apoε4= Apolipoprotein ε4.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Panel A displays the predicted probability of diagnostic conversion for NC over the spectrum of BMI (kg/m2), showing a decreasing probability of conversion with higher baseline BMI. Panel B displays the corresponding predicted probability of conversion for MCI, showing a similar pattern but with overall greater probability of conversion at every BMI value. Panels C and D display the predicted probability of conversion stratified by the presence or absence of significant weight in the 12 months preceding outcome measure (dotted line representing absence of significant weight loss, dashed line representing significant weight loss). For all panels, data are fitted for a given participant profile (using prevalent level for categorical covariates and median for continuous covariates), including age (75), years of education (16), race (White), sex (female), total years in study (3), modified FSRP (12). Shading reflects 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013;80(19):1778–83. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yaffe K, Lindquist K, Vittinghoff E, Barnes D, Simonsick EM, Newman A, Satterfield S, Rosano C, Rubin SM, Ayonayon HN, et al. The effect of maintaining cognition on risk of disability and death. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2010;58(5):889–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02818.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiffczyk C, Romero B, Jonas C, Lahmeyer C, Muller F, Riepe MW. Generic quality of life assessment in dementia patients: a prospective cohort study. BMC neurology. 2010;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-48. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandman PO, Adolfsson R, Nygren C, Hallmans G, Winblad B. Nutritional status and dietary intake in institutionalized patients with Alzheimer’s disease and multiinfarct dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1987;35(1):31–8. - PubMed
    1. White H, Pieper C, Schmader K. The association of weight change in Alzheimer’s disease with severity of disease and mortality: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1998;46(10):1223–7. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding