Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Apr;21(4):438-444.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0372. Epub 2017 Nov 30.

A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service's Impact on Care of Advanced Cancer Patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service's Impact on Care of Advanced Cancer Patients

Sanders Chang et al. J Palliat Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is a commonly utilized intervention for symptom palliation among patients with metastatic cancer, yet it is under-recognized as a distinct area of subspecialty within radiation oncology.

Objective: We developed a multidisciplinary service model within radiation oncology called the Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult (PROC) service to improve the quality of cancer care for advanced cancer patients. We assessed the service's impact on patient-related and healthcare utilization outcomes.

Design: Patients were included in this observational cohort study if they received PRT at a single tertiary care hospital between 2009 and 2017. We compared outcomes of patients treated after (post-intervention group) to those treated before (control group) PROC's establishment using unadjusted and propensity score adjusted analyses.

Results: Of the 450 patients in the cohort, 154 receive PRT pre- and 296 after PROC's establishment. In comparison to patients treated pre-PROC, post-PROC patients were more likely to undergo single-fraction radiation (RR: 7.74, 95% CI: 3.84-15.57) and hypofraction (2-5 fraction) radiation (RR: 10.74, 95% CI: 5.82-19.83), require shorter hospital stays (21 vs. 26.5 median days, p = 0.01), and receive more timely specialty-level palliative care (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.56-4.49). Despite shortened treatments, symptom relief was similar (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.80-2.28).

Conclusion: The PROC service was associated with more efficient radiation courses, substantially reduced hospital length of stays, and more timely palliative care consultation, without compromising symptom improvements. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary care delivery model can lead to enhanced quality of care for advanced cancer patients.

Keywords: bone metastases; consult service; length of stay; palliative radiation therapy; radiotherapy planning; symptom improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Juan Wisnivesky is a member of the research board at EHE International, and has received consulting honoraria from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Quintiles, and research grants from Sanofi and Quorum Consulting. No other authors have competing financial interests to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, et al. : Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: An ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:965–976 - PubMed
    1. Chow E, Wu JS, Hoskin P, et al. : International consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2002;64:275–280 - PubMed
    1. Jones JA, Simone CB, 2nd: Palliative radiotherapy for advanced malignancies in a changing oncologic landscape: Guiding principles and practice implementation. Ann Palliat Med 2014;3:192–202 - PubMed
    1. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, et al. : Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: A systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1423–1436 - PubMed
    1. Conway JL, Yurkowski E, Glazier J, et al. : Comparison of patient-reported outcomes with single versus multiple fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis in a population-based cohort. Radiother Oncol 2016;119:202–207 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources