Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188663.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188663. eCollection 2017.

Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review

Valérie Marcoux  1 , Maud-Christine Chouinard  2   3 , Fatoumata Diadiou  3 , Isabelle Dufour  1   2 , Catherine Hudon  1   4
Affiliations

Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review

Valérie Marcoux et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Many people with chronic conditions have complex health needs often due to multiple chronic conditions, psychiatric comorbidities, psychosocial issues, or a combination of these factors. They are at high risk of frequent use of healthcare services. To offer these patients interventions adapted to their needs, it is crucial to be able to identify them early.

Objective: The aim of this study was to find all existing screening tools that identify patients with complex health needs at risk of frequent use of healthcare services, and to highlight their principal characteristics. Our purpose was to find a short, valid screening tool to identify adult patients of all ages.

Methods: A scoping review was performed on articles published between 1985 and July 2016, retrieved through a comprehensive search of the Scopus and CINAHL databases, following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), and completed by Levac et al. (2010).

Results: Of the 3,818 articles identified, 30 were included, presenting 14 different screening tools. Seven tools were self-reported. Five targeted adult patients, and nine geriatric patients. Two tools were designed for specific populations. Four can be completed in 15 minutes or less. Most screening tools target elderly persons. The INTERMED self-assessment (IM-SA) targets adults of all ages and can be completed in less than 15 minutes.

Conclusion: Future research could evaluate its usefulness as a screening tool for identifying patients with complex needs at risk of becoming high users of healthcare services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Scoping review–flowchart of search results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, Lumpkin J, Selberg J. Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients—An Urgent Priority. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(10):909–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608511 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byrne M, Murphy AW, Plunkett PK, McGee HM, Murray A, Bury G. Frequent attenders to an emergency department: a study of primary health care use, medical profile, and psychosocial characteristics. Annals of emergency medicine. 2003;41(3):309–18. Epub 2003/02/28. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.68 [pii]. . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hansagi H, Olsson M, Sjoberg S, Tomson Y, Goransson S. Frequent use of the hospital emergency department is indicative of high use of other health care services. Annals of emergency medicine. 2001;37(6):561–7. Epub 2001/06/01. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111762 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soril LJJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Reducing Frequent Visits to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Interventions. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123660 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123660 PubMed PMID: PMC4395429. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Althaus F, Paroz S, Hugli O, Ghali WA, Daeppen JB, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, et al. Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review. Annals of emergency medicine. 2011;58(1):41–52 e42. Epub 2011/06/22. doi: S0196-0644(11)00212-5 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007 . - DOI - PubMed