Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;55(1):1-31.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0636-5.

Sequential Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on Children's Reading and Math Test Scores

Affiliations

Sequential Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on Children's Reading and Math Test Scores

Andrew L Hicks et al. Demography. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Prior research has suggested that children living in a disadvantaged neighborhood have lower achievement test scores, but these studies typically have not estimated causal effects that account for neighborhood choice. Recent studies used propensity score methods to account for the endogeneity of neighborhood exposures, comparing disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged neighborhoods. We develop an alternative propensity function approach in which cumulative neighborhood effects are modeled as a continuous treatment variable. This approach offers several advantages. We use our approach to examine the cumulative effects of neighborhood disadvantage on reading and math test scores in Los Angeles. Our substantive results indicate that recency of exposure to disadvantaged neighborhoods may be more important than average exposure for children's test scores. We conclude that studies of child development should consider both average cumulative neighborhood exposure and the timing of this exposure.

Keywords: Child Development; Neighborhoods; Propensity function models; Residential histories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Density and scatter plots for average expected treatment versus recency of treatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Estimated effects of average expected neighborhood disadvantage and average expected recency of exposure to neighborhood disadvantage on reading and math scores. DRF = dose-response function

Comment in

References

    1. Aaronson D. Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children's educational outcomes. Journal of Human Resources. 1998;33:915–946.
    1. Alvarado S. Delayed disadvantage: Neighborhood context and child development. Social Forces. 2016;94:1847–1877.
    1. Aneshensel CS, Sucoff CA. The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1996;37:293–310. - PubMed
    1. Briggs XdS, Keys BJ. Has exposure to poor neighbourhoods changed in America? Race, risk and housing locations in two decades. Urban Studies. 2009;46:429–458.
    1. Brumback BA, Hernán MA, Haneuse SJ, Robins JM. Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures. Statistics in Medicine. 2004;23:749–767. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms