Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;118(2):303-312.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3770-2. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

Body position influences arterial occlusion pressure: implications for the standardization of pressure during blood flow restricted exercise

Affiliations

Body position influences arterial occlusion pressure: implications for the standardization of pressure during blood flow restricted exercise

Peter Sieljacks et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) measured in a supine position is often used to set cuff pressures for blood flow restricted exercise (BFRE). However, supine AOP may not reflect seated or standing AOP, thus potentially influencing the degree of occlusion. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of body position on AOP. A secondary aim was to investigate predictors of AOP using wide and narrow cuffs.

Methods: Twenty-four subjects underwent measurements of thigh circumference, skinfold and blood pressure, followed by assessments of thigh AOP in supine and seated positions with a wide and a narrow cuff, respectively, using Doppler ultrasound.

Results: In the supine position, AOP was 148 ± 19 and 348 ± 94 mmHg with the wide and narrow cuff, respectively. This increased to 177 ± 20 and 409 ± 101 mmHg in the seated position, with correlations between supine and seated AOP of R 2 = 0.81 and R 2 = 0.50 for the wide and narrow cuff, respectively. For both cuff widths, thigh circumference constituted the strongest predictor of AOP, with diastolic blood pressure explaining additional variance with the wide cuff. The predictive strength of these variables did not differ between body positions.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that body position strongly influences lower limb AOP, especially with narrow cuffs, yielding very high AOP (≥ 500-600 mmHg) in some subjects. This should be taken into account in the standardization of cuff pressures used during BFRE to better control the physiological effects of BFRE.

Keywords: Arterial occlusion pressure; Blood flow occlusion; Kaatsu; Occlusion training; Pulse elimination pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Oct 25;16(5):473 - PubMed
    1. Int J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;29(8):664-7 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jul;117(7):1493-1499 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(6):772-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Dec;115(12):2471-80 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources