Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
- PMID: 29199007
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.11.019
Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
Abstract
Objectives: Polymerization shrinkage of resin composite restorations can cause debonding at the tooth-restoration interface. Theory based on the mechanics of materials predicts that debonding at the pulpal floor would half the shrinkage displacement at the occlusal surface. The aim of this study is to test this theory and to examine the possibility of detecting subsurface resin composite restoration debonding by measuring the superficial shrinkage displacements.
Methods: A commercial dental resin composite with linear shrinkage strain of 0.8% was used to restore 2 groups of 5 model Class-II cavities (8-mm long, 4-mm wide and 4-mm deep) in aluminum blocks (8-mm thick, 10-mm wide and 14-mm tall). Group I had the restorations bonded to all cavity surfaces, while Group II had the restorations not bonded to the cavity floor to simulate debonding. One of the proximal surfaces of each specimen was sprayed with fine carbon powder to allow surface displacement measurement by Digital Image Correlation. Images of the speckled surface were taken before and after cure for displacement calculation. The experiment was simulated using finite element analysis (FEA) for comparison.
Results: Group I showed a maximum occlusal displacement of 34.7±6.7μm and a center of contraction (COC) near the pulpal floor. Group II had a COC coinciding with the geometric center and showed a maximum occlusal displacement of 17.4±3.8μm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p-value=0.0007). Similar results were obtained by FEA. The theoretical shrinkage displacement was 44.6 and 22.3μm for Group I and II, respectively. The lower experimental displacements were probably caused by slumping of the resin composite before cure and deformation of the adhesive layer.
Significance: The results confirmed that the occlusal shrinkage displacement of a resin composite restoration was reduced significantly by pulpal floor debonding. Recent in vitro studies seem to indicate that this reduction in shrinkage displacement could be detected by using the most accurate intraoral scanners currently available. Thus, subject to clinical validation, the occlusal displacement of a resin composite restoration may be used to assess its interfacial integrity.
Keywords: Debonding; Dental restoration; Intraoral scanner; Polymerization shrinkage; Resin composite.
Copyright © 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
An acoustic emission study on interfacial debonding in composite restorations.Dent Mater. 2011 Sep;27(9):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Dent Mater. 2011. PMID: 21700327
-
Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.Dent Mater. 2017 Jun;33(6):690-701. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Apr 14. Dent Mater. 2017. PMID: 28413061
-
Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.J Dent Res. 2013 Jan;92(1):76-81. doi: 10.1177/0022034512465757. Epub 2012 Oct 25. J Dent Res. 2013. PMID: 23100273
-
Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17. J Prosthodont. 2019. PMID: 28513897 Review.
-
A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Sep 1;7(4):79-88. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006. PMID: 16957794 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources