Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 21:3:21.
doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0060-2. eCollection 2017.

A half century of electronic fetal monitoring and bioethics: silence speaks louder than words

Thomas P Sartwelle  1 , James C Johnston  2   3 , Berna Arda  4
Affiliations
Review

A half century of electronic fetal monitoring and bioethics: silence speaks louder than words

Thomas P Sartwelle et al. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. .

Abstract

Bioethics abolished the prevailing Hippocratic tenet instructing physicians to make treatment decisions, replacing it with autonomy through informed consent. Informed consent allows the patient to choose treatment after options are explained by the physician. The appearance of bioethics in 1970 coincided with the introduction of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), which evolved to become the fetal surveillance modality of choice for virtually all women in labor. Autonomy rapidly pervaded all medical procedures, but there was a clear exemption for EFM. Even today, EFM remains immune to the doctrine of informed consent despite continually mounting evidence which proves the procedure is nothing more than myth, illusion and junk science that subjects mothers and babies alike to increased risks of morbidity and mortality. And ethicists have remained utterly silent through a half century of EFM misuse. Our article explores this egregious ethical failure by reviewing EFM's lack of clinical efficacy, discussing the EFM related harm to mothers and babies, and focusing on the reasons that this obstetrical procedure eluded the revolutionary change from the Hippocratic tradition to autonomy through informed consent.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Electronic fetal monitoring; Medical ethics; Medical malpractice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the manuscript for submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Quilligan EJ, Paul RH. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it? Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45(1):96–100. - PubMed
    1. Freeman RK, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP, Miller LA. Fetal heat rate monitoring. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
    1. Parer JT. Personalities, politics, and territorial tiffs: a half century of fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):548–550. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkins HML. Thirty years of electronic intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: discussion paper. J Royal Soc Med. 1989;82:210–214. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200410. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sartwelle TP. Electronic fetal monitoring: a bridge too far. J Legal Med. 2012;33:313–379. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2012.714321. - DOI - PubMed