Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 6:1:11.
doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0023-4. eCollection 2016.

Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one

Affiliations
Review

Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one

Amy M Lee et al. Contracept Reprod Med. .

Abstract

Despite the highest historical live birth success rates for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), there has been an epidemic of iatrogenic twin and higher order gestation conceived from this treatment. Continued improvement in cryopreservation techniques have allowed preservation of supernumerary embryos for use in future cycles, and refinements in culture systems and embryo selection have resulted in the transfer of fewer embryos while maintaining favorable pregnancy rates. The voluntary transfer of a single high quality embryo, elective single embryo transfer (eSET), has significantly reduced multiple gestation rates and maximized the rate of singleton pregnancy without compromising overall success rates. Although eSET is the standard of care in several developed countries, utilization in the United States has been slow. States with mandated IVF insurance have seen decreases in preterm birth rates yielding down stream health care savings. Herein, the evolution and future applications of this practice to reduce the risk of iatrogenic twins is reviewed.

Keywords: Elective single embryo transfer; In-vitro fertilization; Infertility; Twin gestation assisted reproductive technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Desired treatment outcome a before education and b after education. Reprinted from Fertil Steril, 88/2, Ryan et al. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates, 354–60, Copyright (2007), with permission from Elsevier [39]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cycles with single embryo transfer. Trends in the percentage of cycles using elective single embryo transfer, United States from 2005 to 2013. The data source for this figure was the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (CORS) database (http://www.sart.org)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Muasher S, Wilkes C, Garcia J, Rosenwaks Z, Jones H. Benefits and risks of multiple transfer with in vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1984;323(8376):570. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90974-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craft I, Porter R, Green S, Tucker M, Smith B, Twigg H, et al. Success of fertility, embryo number, and in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1984;323(8379):732. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)92241-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feichtinger W, Szalay S, Kemeter P, Beck A, Janisch H. Twin pregnancy after laparoscopic oocyte recovery, in-vitro fertilization and embryotransfer (author's transl) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1982;42(3):197. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1037262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerin J, Quinn P, Kirby C, Seamark R, Warnes G, Jeffrey R, et al. Incidence of multiple pregnancy after in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer. Lancet. 1983;322(8349):537–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90569-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tummers P, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1720–3. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg308. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources