Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Sep 29;9(9):e1730.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.1730.

Overtube-Assisted Foreign Body Removal: A Review of Endoscopic Management and Case Illustration

Affiliations
Case Reports

Overtube-Assisted Foreign Body Removal: A Review of Endoscopic Management and Case Illustration

Andrew Ofosu et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The ingestion of foreign bodies is a common medical emergency seen in both adults and children. In children, the most commonly ingested foreign bodies include coins, toys, magnets, and batteries. In adults, food bolus impaction represents the most common cause of foreign body ingestion. The majority of foreign bodies pass spontaneously. Sharp or pointed objects increase the risk of perforation. Emergent endoscopic intervention is indicated in cases of esophageal obstruction, ingestion of disk batteries, and sharp pointed objects in the esophagus. Flexible endoscopy is the therapeutic method of choice for removing foreign bodies. It is preferred due to its high success rate and low risk for complications. Additionally, the use of an overtube provides gastric and esophageal protection from mucosal laceration. We present a 27-year-old male who ingested six razor blades and a curtain hook and review endoscopic management.

Keywords: endoscopy; foreign body; overtube; treatment management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A – Coronal computed tomography scan of a curtain hook (arrow). B – Axial computed tomography scan showing a curtain hook and a single razor blade (arrows). C – Endoscopic visualization of razor blades and a curtain hook in the stomach. D – Razor blade seen at the gastroesophageal junction. E – Overtube (asterisk) was used to protect the mucosal wall during foreign body removal. F – Six razor blades and a curtain hook were sequentially removed from the body of the stomach.

References

    1. National Safety Council Injury Facts. Webb WA. http://www.nsc.org/Membership%20Site%20Document%20Library/2015%20Injury%... Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;41:39–51. - PubMed
    1. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Webb WA. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:39–51. - PubMed
    1. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a review. Sugawa C, Ono H, Taleb M, et al. World J Gastrointest. 2014;6:475–481. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Outcomes of acute esophageal food impaction: success of the push technique. Vicari JJ, Johanson JF, Frakes JT. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:178–181. - PubMed
    1. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH, et al. Endoscopy. 2016;48:489–496. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources