Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Spontaneous vs in vitro Fertilization
- PMID: 29201793
- PMCID: PMC5670254
- DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1232
Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Spontaneous vs in vitro Fertilization
Abstract
Aim: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver disease in pregnancy. Although it was shown that multiple pregnancy and hormone therapies increase the risk of ICP, there is limited information that compared spontaneous fertilization and in vitro fertilization (IVF) from the aspect of developing ICP. In our study, we investigated the potential relationship between ICP and IVF/ spontaneous pregnancy.
Materials and methods: We reviewed the records (between June 2007 and December 2014) of pregnancies with ICP who were referred to gastroenterology clinics in three different hospitals. Fifty-nine pregnancies (43 spontaneous fertilization, 16 IVF) with ICP were analyzed from the aspect of age, fertilization type, multiple/singleton pregnancy, delivery week, and biochemical results.
Results: We found that serum bile acid levels were higher in the IVF group than the spontaneous fertilization group (32.8 ± 20 vs 19.6 ± 19 μmol/L; p < 0.05). There was a significant inverse correlation between serum bile acid levels and gestational age (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) in the whole group. There was no difference between IVF and spontaneous fertilization groups in term of age, onset time of symptoms, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin levels, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), and platelet count.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the serum bile acid levels are higher in IVF than in spontaneous pregnancies with ICP, but its clinical implications are not clear. Further prospective studies with large number of ICP cases are needed to clarify the effect of IVF on ICP.How to cite this article: Bolukbas FF, Bolukbas C, Balaban HY, Aygun C, Ignak S, Ergul E, Yazicioglu M, Ersahin SS. Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Spontaneous vs in vitro Fertilization. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2017;7(2):126-129.
Keywords: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; Pruritus; Stillbirth.; Bile acid; In vitro fertilization.
Conflict of interest statement
Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None
References
-
- Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Karinen L, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Martikainen H, Tuomivaara L, Jarvelin MR. The course of pregnancy and delivery and the use of maternal healthcare services after standard IVF in Northern Finland 1990-1995. Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2897–2903. - PubMed
-
- Heinonen S, Kirkinen P. Pregnancy outcome with intrahepatic cholestasis. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;94(2):189–193. - PubMed
-
- Riely CA, Bacq Y. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Clin Liver Dis. 2004 Feb;8(1):167–176. - PubMed
-
- Williamson C, Geenes V. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):120–133. - PubMed
-
- Henderson CE, Shah RR, Gottimukkala S, Ferreira KK, Hamaoui A, Mercado R. Primum non nocere: how active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):189–196. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources