Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;41(5):793-800.
doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.793. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Reliability and Validity of a New Method for Isometric Back Extensor Strength Evaluation Using A Hand-Held Dynamometer

Hee-Won Park  1   2   3 , Sora Baek  1   2 , Hong Young Kim  2 , Jung-Gyoo Park  3 , Eun Kyoung Kang  1   2
Affiliations

Reliability and Validity of a New Method for Isometric Back Extensor Strength Evaluation Using A Hand-Held Dynamometer

Hee-Won Park et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of a new method for isometric back extensor strength measurement using a portable dynamometer.

Methods: A chair equipped with a small portable dynamometer was designed (Power Track II Commander Muscle Tester). A total of 15 men (mean age, 34.8±7.5 years) and 15 women (mean age, 33.1±5.5 years) with no current back problems or previous history of back surgery were recruited. Subjects were asked to push the back of the chair while seated, and their isometric back extensor strength was measured by the portable dynamometer. Test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For the validity assessment, isometric back extensor strength of all subjects was measured by a widely used physical performance evaluation instrument, BTE PrimusRS system. The limit of agreement (LoA) from the Bland-Altman plot was evaluated between two methods.

Results: The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC=0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.91). The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated acceptable agreement between the two methods: the lower 95% LoA was -63.1 N and the upper 95% LoA was 61.1 N.

Conclusion: This study shows that isometric back extensor strength measurement using a portable dynamometer has good reliability and validity.

Keywords: Back muscles; Isometric contraction; Muscle strength dynamometer; Reproducibility of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Device setting for isometric back extensor strength evaluation with portable dynamometer. (A) Portable dynamometer (Power Track II Commander Muscle Tester; JTECH Medical, Midvale, UT, USA) composed of a compression force sensor (left) and a control/recording unit (right). (B) Square back plate. This wooden plate interface with subjects' back muscle and transmit compression pressure to the attached force sensor unit. (C) Specially designed chair. Vertical linear groove in seatback center is designed for holding a sensor unit with a ruler to set the sensor unit in a specific height. (D) Subject seated in the chair and the pelvis fixed by fastening the seat belt. Square back plate was shown in the red elliptical circle between chair seatback and subjects. The force sensor unit is not visible because it is inserted into the center groove of the chair.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Isometric back extensor strength evaluation with isokinetic dynamometer machine (PrimusRS; BTE Technologies Inc., Hanover, MD, USA).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Correlation between PrimusRS and new method (p<0.001).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Bland-Altman plot for muscle strength data. Dotted line indicates 95% limits of agreement ranging from −63.1 to 61.1 N.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Little P, Smith L, Cantrell T, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R. General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1996;312:485–488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chok B, Lee R, Latimer J, Tan SB. Endurance training of the trunk extensor muscles in people with subacute low back pain. Phys Ther. 1999;79:1032–1042. - PubMed
    1. Kaser L, Mannion AF, Rhyner A, Weber E, Dvorak J, Muntener M. Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 2. Effects on paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area, fiber type size, and distribution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:909–919. - PubMed
    1. Moon HJ, Choi KH, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lee KH, et al. Effect of lumbar stabilization and dynamic lumbar strengthening exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37:110–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh DK, Bailey M, Lee R. Decline in lumbar extensor muscle strength the older adults: correlation with age, gender and spine morphology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:215. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources