Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 19;3(4):593-602.
doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.09.001. eCollection 2017 Nov.

Traumatic exposures, posttraumatic stress disorder, and cognitive functioning in World Trade Center responders

Affiliations

Traumatic exposures, posttraumatic stress disorder, and cognitive functioning in World Trade Center responders

Sean Clouston et al. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). .

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined whether World Trade Center (WTC)-related exposures and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were associated with cognitive function and whether WTC responders' cognition differed from normative data.

Methods: A computer-assisted neuropsychological battery was administered to a prospective cohort study of 1193 WTC responders with no history of stroke or WTC-related head injuries. Data were linked to information collected prospectively since 2002. Sample averages were compared to published norms.

Results: Approximately 14.8% of sampled responders had cognitive dysfunction. WTC responders had worse cognitive function compared to normative data. PTSD symptom severity and working >5 weeks on-site was associated with lower cognition.

Discussion: Results from this sample highlight the potential for WTC responders to be experiencing an increased burden of cognitive dysfunction and linked lowered cognitive functioning to physical exposures and to PTSD. Future research is warranted to understand the extent to which cognitive dysfunction is evident in neural dysfunction.

Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction; Particulate exposure; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Trauma; World Trade Center.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sample inclusion and exclusion criteria, World Trade Center (WTC) Cognitive Aging Study 2015–2016.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparisons between World Trade Center responders and Cogstate normative data. Dark gray, WTC responders with possible PTSD; White, WTC responders without possible PTSD; Light gray, normative comparison population. Two-tailed t tests were used to compare groups and to compare estimated age effects between groups. (A) Shows differences between WTC responders with and without PTSD and normal controls in memory. (B) Shows differences between WTC responders with and without PTSD and normal controls in reaction speed. (C) Shows differences between WTC responders with and without PTSD and normal controls in processing speed. *Significantly different compared to normative data when adjusting for the false discovery rate. Abbreviations: a/s, answers per second; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; WTC, World Trade Center.

References

    1. McKhann G.M., Knopman D.S., Chertkow H., Hyman B.T., Jack C.R., Jr., Kawas C.H. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer's Association Alzheimer's disease: facts and figures. Alzheimer's Dement. 2014;8:131–168. - PubMed
    1. Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2013. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2016;65:1–14. - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer's Association 2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:459–509. - PubMed
    1. Richards M., Deary I.J. A life course approach to cognitive capability. In: Kuh D., Cooper R., Hardy R., Richards M., Ben-Shlomo Y., editors. A Life Course Approach to Healthy Ageing. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2014. pp. 32–45.