Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
- PMID: 29202616
- PMCID: PMC8816392
- DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
Abstract
In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.
Keywords: General practice/family medicine; general; publishing; qualitative designs and methods; reflexivity; trustworthiness.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Similar articles
-
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018. PMID: 29199486 Free PMC article.
-
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs.Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):274-279. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017. PMID: 29185826 Free PMC article.
-
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction.Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):271-273. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017. PMID: 29185831 Free PMC article.
-
[Guide to write a scientific article].Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):101424. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2023.101424. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2024. PMID: 37931496 Review. Spanish.
-
Validity in qualitative health education research.Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Feb;11(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019. PMID: 30733020 Review.
Cited by
-
Blended learning: Exploring nurse educators' perspectives.Health SA. 2024 Aug 6;29:2659. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2659. eCollection 2024. Health SA. 2024. PMID: 39229321 Free PMC article.
-
Strabismic Adults' Experiences of Psychosocial Influence of Strabismus-A Qualitative Study.SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 5;10:23779608241278456. doi: 10.1177/23779608241278456. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39246297 Free PMC article.
-
Family Experiences of Loss and Bereavement in Palliative Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;12(17):1763. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171763. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39273788 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing the HEADSS psychosocial screening tool for adolescents living with HIV/AIDS in teen club program in Malawi: health care providers perspectives.Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jan 31;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00520-3. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022. PMID: 35101066 Free PMC article.
-
Is it worth it? A qualitative analysis of the impact of medical education fellowships on careers.AEM Educ Train. 2022 Dec 1;6(6):e10819. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10819. eCollection 2022 Dec. AEM Educ Train. 2022. PMID: 36518233 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lincoln YS, Guba EG.. Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications; 1985.
-
- Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–851.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical