Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects
- PMID: 29202976
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.014
Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects
Abstract
Objective: To study the perinatal outcomes between singleton live births achieved with the use of commissioned versus spontaneously conceived embryos carried by the same gestational surrogate.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Academic in vitro fertilization center.
Patient(s): Gestational surrogate.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Pregnancy outcome, gestational age at birth, birth weight, perinatal complications.
Result(s): We identified 124 gestational surrogates who achieved a total of 494 pregnancies. Pregnancy outcomes for surrogate and spontaneous pregnancies were significantly different (P<.001), with surrogate pregnancies more likely to result in twin pregnancies: 33% vs. 1%. Miscarriage and ectopic rates were similar. Of these pregnancies, there were 352 singleton live births: 103 achieved from commissioned embryos and 249 conceived spontaneously. Surrogate births had lower mean gestational age at delivery (38.8 ± 2.1 vs. 39.7 ± 1.4), higher rates of preterm birth (10.7% vs. 3.1%), and higher rates of low birth weight (7.8% vs. 2.4%). Neonates from surrogacy had birth weights that were, on average, 105 g lower. Surrogate births had significantly higher obstetrical complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, use of amniocentesis, placenta previa, antibiotic requirement during labor, and cesarean section.
Conclusion(s): Neonates born from commissioned embryos and carried by gestational surrogates have increased adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, hypertension, maternal gestational diabetes, and placenta previa, compared with singletons conceived spontaneously and carried by the same woman. Our data suggest that assisted reproductive procedures may potentially affect embryo quality and that its negative impact can not be overcome even with a proven healthy uterine environment.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; embryo culture; gestational carrier; gestational surrogacy; in vitro fertilization; perinatal outcome.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Unlocking the cause of increased adverse singleton pregnancy outcomes: the role of the assisted reproductive technology derived embryo.Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):953-954. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.030. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 29202971 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of oocyte donation on perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies.Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):948-953.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28283263
-
Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Oct 20;132(20):2408-2416. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000484. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019. PMID: 31634242 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):330-342.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019. Epub 2018 Jan 11. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29331236 Review.
-
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014. PMID: 25412164
-
Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.18930. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29114987 Review.
Cited by
-
Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.F S Rev. 2022 Oct;3(4):242-255. doi: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jul 5. F S Rev. 2022. PMID: 36505962 Free PMC article.
-
Balancing risks and rewards in the context of shared motherhood IVF.Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):777-779. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead062. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37009807 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ASAS-SSR Triennnial Reproduction Symposium: Looking Back and Moving Forward-How Reproductive Physiology has Evolved: Fetal origins of impaired muscle growth and metabolic dysfunction: Lessons from the heat-stressed pregnant ewe.J Anim Sci. 2018 Jun 29;96(7):2987-3002. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky164. J Anim Sci. 2018. PMID: 29701769 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analyses of child cardiometabolic phenotype following assisted reproductive technologies using a pragmatic trial emulation approach.Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 23;12(1):5613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25899-4. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 34556649 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technology in SARS-CoV-2-infected women: a prospective observational study.Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33972083 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources