Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 4;7(12):e018498.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018498.

Obesity prevalence among healthcare professionals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Health Survey for England

Affiliations

Obesity prevalence among healthcare professionals in England: a cross-sectional study using the Health Survey for England

Richard G Kyle et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To estimate obesity prevalence among healthcare professionals in England and compare prevalence with those working outside of the health services.

Design: Cross-sectional study based on data from 5 years (2008-2012) of the nationally representative Health Survey for England.

Setting: England.

Participants: 20 103 adults aged 17-65 years indicating they were economically active at the time of survey classified into four occupational groups: nurses (n=422), other healthcare professionals (n=412), unregistered care workers (n=736) and individuals employed in non-health-related occupations (n=18 533).

Outcome measure: Prevalence of obesity defined as body mass index ≥30.0 with 95% CIs and weighted to reflect the population.

Results: Obesity prevalence was high across all occupational groups including: among nurses (25.1%, 95% CI 20.9% to 29.4%); other healthcare professionals (14.4%, 95% CI 11.0% to 17.8%); non-health-related occupations (23.5%, 95% CI 22.9% to 24.1%); and unregistered care workers who had the highest prevalence of obesity (31.9%, 95% CI 28.4% to 35.3%). A logistic regression model adjusted for sociodemographic composition and survey year indicated that, compared with nurses, the odds of being obese were significantly lower for other healthcare professionals (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.75) and higher for unregistered care workers (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.93). There was no significant difference in obesity prevalence between nurses and people working in non-health-related occupations (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.18).

Conclusions: High obesity prevalence among nurses and unregistered care workers is concerning as it increases the risks of musculoskeletal conditions and mental health conditions that are the main causes of sickness absence in health services. Further research is required to better understand the reasons for high obesity prevalence among healthcare professionals in England to inform interventions to support individuals to achieve and maintain a healthy weight.

Keywords: health survey for england; nursing; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Logue J, Murray HM, Welsh P, et al. Obesity is associated with fatal coronary heart disease independently of traditional risk factors and deprivation. Heart 2011;97:564–8. 10.1136/hrt.2010.211201 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 2008;371:569–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell JA, Kivimaki M, Hamer M. Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev 2014;15:504–15. 10.1111/obr.12157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reed LF, Battistutta D, Young J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for foot and ankle musculoskeletal disorders experienced by nurses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:196 10.1186/1471-2474-15-196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 2011;378:815–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60814-3 - DOI - PubMed