Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancers
- PMID: 29203973
- PMCID: PMC5705496
- DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0571-8
Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancers
Abstract
Surgery for low rectal cancer often involves a permanent stoma. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) with colo-anal anastomosis is a valuable sphincter sparing surgical procedure that avoids the need for permanent stoma in patients with low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term functional and oncological outcomes following ISR. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent ISR with colo-anal anastomosis in our institution between 2007 and 2015. All patients had a diversion stoma. Bowel function outcomes were assessed prospectively using Wexner incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS), and the Cancer Institute Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire. The histological reports were reviewed to assess the oncological adequacy of the surgery. Patterns of recurrence and survival were analyzed in this group of patients. Thirty-three patients who underwent an ISR were eligible for this study. Laparoscopic resection was performed in five patients. All the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation except the two who received short course radiation and one who did not receive any neoadjuvant treatment. The median distance from the anal verge to the distal edge of the tumor was 3 cm (range 1.5-5 cm). Distal resection margins and circumferential resection margins were negative in all the patients. The 30-day post-operative mortality rate was 3.03%. In 20 patients with a median follow-up of 48 months, the 3-year overall survival was 95%. One patient had recurrence in the para-aortic nodes. No patient had a local recurrence. Bowel function was assessed in 18 patients who had a minimum stoma free period of 1 year. After a median of 43 months following stoma closure, the median Wexner score was 3.56 (range 0-19), median LARS score was 4.78 (range 0-33), and the mean Cancer Institute QoL score was 151.56 ± 15.741. The QoL was average to very high with an overall acceptable quality of life. In this study, ISR was associated with acceptable long-term functional and oncological outcomes. It can be considered as a safe alternative to a permanent stoma in selected patients with low rectal cancer.
Keywords: Intersphincteric resection; Low rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Outcome; Sphincter sparing surgery.
Similar articles
-
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21822556
-
[Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):904-909. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28836252 Chinese.
-
[Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.008. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31874529 Chinese.
-
Ultimate Functional Preservation With Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer.Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 5;10:297. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00297. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32195192 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: A review of the updated literature.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Apr 25;1(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12003. eCollection 2017 Apr. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017. PMID: 29863144 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study.World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 7;16(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1513-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30404633 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 20;2020:8928109. doi: 10.1155/2020/8928109. eCollection 2020. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020. PMID: 32765603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive model for sphincter preservation in lower rectal cancer.World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 24;16(8):107596. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.107596. World J Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40901315 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of biofeedback training on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled study.Ann Transl Med. 2019 Nov;7(21):605. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.62. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 32047766 Free PMC article.
-
Critical and Challenging Issues in the Surgical Management of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer.Yonsei Med J. 2018 Aug;59(6):703-716. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.6.703. Yonsei Med J. 2018. PMID: 29978607 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, et al (2013) Cancer incidence in five continents, Vol. X (electronic version). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Scientific Publication No. 164
-
- Deepak Damodaran, Ramakrishnan A S Clinicopathological attributes and outcomes of treatment in young-onset rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis e-pub ahead of print. DOI 10.1007/s00384-015-2266-y. - PubMed
-
- Shaffy SK, Karobi D. Psychosocial experience of the patients with colostomy/ilesotomy: a qualitative study. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2014;30(1–2):28–34.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical