Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;8(4):591-599.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Chinock Cheong  1 , Nam Kyu Kim  1
Affiliations
Review

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Chinock Cheong et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Keywords: Laparoscopic resection; Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reynolds W., Jr The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2001;5(1):89–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Coldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy. 1991;1(3):144–150. - PubMed
    1. Group TCOoSTS A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–2059. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2005;6(7):477–484. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–1726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources