Pegloticase in gout treatment - safety issues, latest evidence and clinical considerations
- PMID: 29204266
- PMCID: PMC5703101
- DOI: 10.1177/2042098617727714
Pegloticase in gout treatment - safety issues, latest evidence and clinical considerations
Abstract
Gout is a common rheumatic condition, with increasing prevalence in recent decades. The mainstay of treatment for gout is oral urate-lowering therapy (ULT), typically with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). Unfortunately, a proportion of patients have persistent gout that is refractory to ULT. Pegloticase, a recombinant pegylated uricase, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of refractory gout. However, concern has been raised regarding the risk of infusion reactions, which are now understood to be largely due to the development of antipegloticase antibodies. Discontinuation of pegloticase upon failure to lower serum urate has been shown to markedly reduce infusion reaction risk, but deprives patients of what, in many cases, is a last-resort treatment. In this manuscript, we review the rationale, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of pegloticase. Additionally, we focus on potential strategies to reduce pegloticase immunogenicity and potentially make this important agent available to a wider group of patients requiring treatment.
Keywords: gout; hyperuricemia; pegloticase; urate-lowering therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: Dr Guttmann has nothing to disclose. Dr Berhanu serves as a site investigator for a trial sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Pillinger reports that he is currently a consultant for Crealta/Horizon, AstraZeneca, Ironwood and SOBI, and currently serves as a site investigator for a trial sponsored by Takeda. Dr Pillinger is additionally supported in part by NYU CTSA grant 1UL1TR001445 from the National Center for the Advancement of Translational Science (NCATS), NIH. Dr Krasnokutsky has served as a consultant for Crealta/Horizon and Ironwood. Dr Krasnokutsky is supported in part by an Investigator Award from the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and was previously supported in part by a New York State Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program (ECRIP) award. This study is an independent work that has not been supported by any funding agency or any corporate sponsor. None of the corporate entities listed above played any role in manuscript design and preparation, or had any access to input to the manuscript prior to publication.
References
- 
    - Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: 3136–3141. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Edwards NL, Sundy JS, Forsythe A, et al. Work productivity loss due to flares in patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy. J Med Econ 2011; 14: 10–15. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Abeles AM, Park JY, Pillinger MH, et al. Update on gout: Pathophysiology and potential treatments. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007; 11: 440–446. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Sundy JS, Becker MA, Baraf HS, et al. Reduction of plasma urate levels following treatment with multiple doses of pegloticase (polyethylene glycol-conjugated uricase) in patients with treatment-failure gout: results of a phase II randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 2882–2891. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Dalbeth N, Merriman TR, Stamp LK. Gout. Lancet 2016; 388: 2039–2052. - PubMed
 
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
 
        