Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 9;3(1):32-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.02.006. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Comparison of 3 mm versus 4 mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy

Gregory S Neel  1 , Ryan L Kau  1 , Stephen F Bansberg  1 , Devyani Lal  1
Affiliations

Comparison of 3 mm versus 4 mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy

Gregory S Neel et al. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: Compare nasal endoscopy with 3 mm versus conventional 4 mm rigid 30° endoscopes for visualization, patient comfort, and examiner ease.

Methods: Ten adults with no previous sinus surgery underwent bilateral nasal endoscopy with both 4 mm and 3 mm endoscopes (resulting in 20 paired nasal endoscopies). Visualization, patient discomfort and examiner's difficulty were assessed with every endoscopy. Sino-nasal structures were checked on a list if visualized satisfactorily. Patients rated discomfort on a standardized numerical pain scale (0-10). Examiners rated difficulty of examination on a scale of 1-5 (1 = easiest).

Results: Visualization with 3 mm endoscope was superior for the sphenoid ostium (P = 0.002), superior turbinate (P = 0.007), spheno-ethmoid recess (P = 0.006), uncinate process (P = 0.002), cribriform area (P = 0.007), and Valve of Hasner (P = 0.002). Patient discomfort was not significantly different for 3 mm vs. 4 mm endoscopes but correlated with the examiners' assessment of difficulty (r = 0.73). The examiner rated endoscopy with 4 mm endoscopes more difficult (P = 0.027).

Conclusions: The 3 mm endoscope was superior in visualizing the sphenoid ostium, superior turbinate, spheno-ethmoid recess, uncinate process, cribriform plate, and valve of Hasner. It therefore may be useful in assessment of spheno-ethmoid recess, nasolacrimal duct, and cribriform area pathologies. Overall, patients tolerated nasal endoscopy well. Though patient discomfort was not significantly different between the endoscopes, most discomfort with 3 mm endoscopes was noted while examining structures difficult to visualize with the 4 mm endoscope. Patients' discomfort correlated with the examiner's assessment of difficulty.

Keywords: 3 mm endoscope; Diagnostic; Nasal endoscopy; Pediatric endoscope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
3 mm 30° nasal endoscopy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
4 mm 30° nasal endoscopy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stammberger H. BC Decker; Philadelphia: 1991. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery; pp. 1–15.
    1. Levine H.L. The office diagnosis of nasal and sinus disorders using rigid nasal endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;102:370–373. - PubMed
    1. Kuhn F.A. Role of endoscopy in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;193(Suppl. 2004):15–18. - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharyya N., Lee L.N. Evaluating the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis based on clinical guidelines and endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:147–151. - PubMed
    1. Nankivell P.C., Pothier D.D. Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122:1024–1028. - PubMed