Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 23;3(2):101-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.05.004. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea

David Folk  1 , Mark D'Agostino  1   2
Affiliations

Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea

David Folk et al. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare sleep-related outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients following base of tongue resection via robotic surgery and endoscopic midline glossectomy.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 114 robotic and 37 endoscopic midline glossectomy surgeries were performed between July 2010 and April 2015 as part of single or multilevel surgery. Patients were excluded for indications other than sleep apnea or if complete sleep studies were not obtained. Thus, 45 robotic and 16 endoscopic surgeries were included in the analysis.

Results: In the robotic surgery group there were statistically significant improvements in AHI [(44.4 ± 22.6) events/h-(14.0 ± 3.0) events/h, P < 0.001] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.3 ± 4.6 to 4.5 ± 2.9, P < 0.001), and O2 nadir (82.0% ± 6.1% to 85.0% ± 5.4%, P < 0.001). In the endoscopic group there were also improvements in AHI (48.7 ± 30.2 to 27.4 ± 31.9, P = 0.06), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.6 ± 5.5 to 8.3 ± 4.5, P = 0.08), and O2 nadir (80.2% ± 8.6% to 82.7% ± 6.5%, P = 0.4). Surgical success rate was 75.6% and 56.3% in the robotic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Greater volume of tissue removed was predictive of surgical success in the robotic cases (10.3 vs. 8.6 ml, P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Both robotic surgery and endoscopic techniques for tongue base reduction improve objective measures of sleep apnea. Greater success rates may be achieved with robotic surgery compared to traditional methods.

Keywords: Midline glossectomy; Partial glossectomy; Posterior glossectomy; Sleep surgery; TORS; Transoral robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shamsuzzaman A.S., Gersh B.J., Somers V.K. Obstructive sleep apnea: implications for cardiac and vascular disease. JAMA. 2003;290:1906–1914. - PubMed
    1. Punjabi N.M., Caffo B.S., Goodwin J.L. Sleep-disordered breathing and mortality: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000132. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marin J.M., Carrizo S.J., Vicente E., Agusti A.G. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea–hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365:1046–1053. - PubMed
    1. Weaver T.E., Grunstein R.R. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5:173–178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fujita S., Conway W., Zorick F., Roth T. Surgical correction of anatomic abnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89:923–934. - PubMed