Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;26(1):5-12.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1063-3.

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke

Affiliations
Review

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke

R J R Snijder et al. Neth Heart J. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

A patent foramen ovale is a common intracardiac finding that is located between the left and right atrium. It can cause right-to-left shunting and has a high prevalence in patients who suffer a cryptogenic stroke. Earlier trials did not show superiority of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure with standard medical therapy over standard medical therapy alone in the treatment of cryptogenic stroke. Interestingly, several meta-analyses show positive results regarding closure, suggesting underpowering of the individual trials. Recently, two large prospective trials and one long-term follow-up study showed benefit of percutaneous closure over standard medical therapy in treatment of cryptogenic stroke. A larger right-to-left shunt or the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm were predictors for a recurrent event. Therefore, percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure after cryptogenic stroke should be recommended over antiplatelet therapy alone in patients younger than 55 years of age with a high-risk patent foramen ovale.

Keywords: Patent foramen ovale; Percutaneous PFO closure; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.J.R. Snijder, M.J. Suttorp, J.M. ten Berg and M.C. Post declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm for the treatment of cryptogenic stroke. ASA atrial septal aneurysm, PFO patent foramen ovale, RLS right-to-left shunt, RoPE risk of paradoxical embolism

References

    1. Overell JR, Bone I, Lees KR. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurology. 2000;55:1172–1179. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.8.1172. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Handke M, et al. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2262–2268. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071422. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Windecker S, Wahl A, Chatterjee T, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism: long-term risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. Circulation. 2000;101:893–898. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.8.893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Post MC, Van Deyk K, Budts W. Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale: Single-centre experience using different types of devices and mid-term outcome. Acta Cardiol. 2005;60:515–519. doi: 10.2143/AC.60.5.2004973. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:991–999. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009639. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources