Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;80(2):586-599.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1461-z.

The role of top-down knowledge about environmental context in egocentric distance judgments

Affiliations

The role of top-down knowledge about environmental context in egocentric distance judgments

John W Philbeck et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Judgments of egocentric distances in well-lit natural environments can differ substantially in indoor versus outdoor contexts. Visual cues (e.g., linear perspective, texture gradients) no doubt play a strong role in context-dependent judgments when cues are abundant. Here we investigated a possible top-down influence on distance judgments that might play a unique role under conditions of perceptual uncertainty: assumptions or knowledge that one is indoors or outdoors. We presented targets in a large outdoor field and in an indoor classroom. To control visual distance and depth cues between the environments, we restricted the field of view by using a 14-deg aperture. Evidence of context effects depended on the response mode: Blindfolded-walking responses were systematically shorter indoors than outdoors, whereas verbal and size gesture judgments showed no context effects. These results suggest that top-down knowledge about the environmental context does not strongly influence visually perceived egocentric distance. However, this knowledge can operate as an output-level bias, such that blindfolded-walking responses are shorter when observers' top-down knowledge indicates that they are indoors and when the size of the room is uncertain.

Keywords: 3-D perception; Perception and action; Scene perception; Space perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andre, J., & Rogers, S. (2006). Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 353–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193682 - DOI
    1. Barlow, H. B. (1958). Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. Journal of Physiology, 141, 337–350. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., & Thompson, W. B. (2005). The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception, 34, 191–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/p5144 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. J. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd ed., pp. 71–117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    1. Da Silva, J. A. (1985). Scales of perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: Comparison of three psychophysical methods. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 119–144.

LinkOut - more resources