Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;80(2):461-484.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1455-x.

Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry

Affiliations

Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry

Nash Unsworth et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Phasic pupillary responses were used to track the active maintenance of information in working memory (WM). In seven experiments participants performed various change detection tasks while their pupils were continuously recorded. Across the experiments phasic pupillary responses increased as the number of maintained items increased up to around 4-5 items consistent with behavioral estimates of capacity. Combining data across experiments demonstrated that phasic pupillary responses were related to behavioral estimates of capacity. Furthermore, phasic pupillary responses demonstrated WM load-dependent relations only when active maintenance was required. When instructed to passively stare at the items or to drop items from WM, the pupil remained near baseline levels. These phasic pupillary responses also tracked the time course of maintenance demonstrating sustained responses early in the delay period, but declined thereafter. Finally, phasic pupillary responses tracked selection processes at encoding (filtering and pre-cues), but did not suggest evidence for item removal following retro-cues. These results are consistent with the notion that maintaining items in WM requires the allocation of effortful attention and further suggest that phasic pupillary responses can be used to track the active maintenance of items in WM.

Keywords: Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adam, K.C.S., Mance, I., Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E.K. (2015). The contributions of attentional lapses to individual differences in working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 1601-1616. - DOI
    1. Allen, R.J., Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.J. (2017). Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1677-1693. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Alnaes, D., Sneve, M. H., Espeseth, T., Endestad, T., van de Pavert, S. H. P., & Laeng, B. (2014). Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. Journal of Vision, 14, 1-20. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus–norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403-450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5, 119-126. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources