Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non-sporulating bacterial inoculants
- PMID: 29205959
- PMCID: PMC5812248
- DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12880
Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non-sporulating bacterial inoculants
Abstract
The application of beneficial, plant-associated microorganisms is a sustainable approach to improving crop performance in agriculture. However, microbial inoculants are often susceptible to prolonged periods of storage and deleterious environmental factors, which negatively impact their viability and ultimately limit efficacy in the field. This particularly concerns non-sporulating bacteria. To overcome this challenge, the availability of protective formulations is crucial. Numerous parameters influence the viability of microbial cells, with drying procedures generally being among the most critical ones. Thus, technological advances to attenuate the desiccation stress imposed on living cells are key to successful formulation development. In this review, we discuss the core aspects important to consider when aiming at high cell viability of non-sporulating bacteria to be applied as microbial inoculants in agriculture. We elaborate the suitability of commonly applied drying methods (freeze-drying, vacuum-drying, spray-drying, fluidized bed-drying, air-drying) and potential measures to prevent cell damage from desiccation (externally applied protectants, stress pre-conditioning, triggering of exopolysaccharide secretion, 'helper' strains). Furthermore, we point out methods for assessing bacterial viability, such as colony counting, spectrophotometry, microcalorimetry, flow cytometry and viability qPCR. Choosing appropriate technologies for maintenance of cell viability and evaluation thereof will render formulation development more efficient. This in turn will aid in utilizing the vast potential of promising, plant beneficial bacteria as sustainable alternatives to standard agrochemicals.
© 2018 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Zeolite-based, dry formulations for conservation and practical application of Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN.J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Apr;122(4):974-986. doi: 10.1111/jam.13360. Epub 2017 Feb 17. J Appl Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 27880032
-
Influence of lyophilization, fluidized bed drying, addition of protectants, and storage on the viability of lactic acid bacteria.J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Jul;107(1):167-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04192.x. Epub 2009 Mar 3. J Appl Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19302330
-
Survival and phosphate solubilisation activity of desiccated formulations of Penicillium bilaiae and Aspergillus niger influenced by water activity.J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jul;150:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 17. J Microbiol Methods. 2018. PMID: 29778653
-
Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: issues and opportunities.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;100(13):5729-46. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7590-9. Epub 2016 May 17. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 27188775 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Desiccation-induced cell damage in bacteria and the relevance for inoculant production.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 May;104(9):3757-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10501-6. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 32170388 Review.
Cited by
-
The Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Halotolerant Bacteria Is Not Phylogenetically Determined: Evidence from Two Bacillus megaterium Strains Isolated from Saline Soils Used to Grow Wheat.Microorganisms. 2023 Jun 28;11(7):1687. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071687. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 37512860 Free PMC article.
-
Biocontrol of Diplodia bulgarica, the causal agent of apple canker, using Trichoderma zelobreve.Arch Microbiol. 2024 Feb 24;206(3):120. doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-03852-5. Arch Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38396230
-
Development and characterization of rice bran-gum Arabic based encapsulated biofertilizer for enhanced shelf life and controlled bacterial release.Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1267730. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267730. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37822736 Free PMC article.
-
A Look at Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria.Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;12(8):1668. doi: 10.3390/plants12081668. Plants (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37111891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Micro-/Nano-Carboxymethyl Cellulose as a Promising Biopolymer with Prospects in the Agriculture Sector: A Review.Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;15(2):440. doi: 10.3390/polym15020440. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36679320 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Achour, M. , Mtimet, N. , Cornelius, C. , Zgouli, S. , Mahjoub, A. , Thonart, P. , and Hamdi, M. (2001) Application of the accelerated shelf life testing method (ASLT) to study the survival rates of freeze‐dried Lactococcus starter cultures. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76: 624–628.
-
- Ahemad, M. , and Kibret, M. (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Uni Sci 26: 1–26.
-
- Amiet‐Charpentier, C. , Gadille, P. , and Benoit, J. (1999) Rhizobacteria microencapsulation: properties of microparticles obtained by spray‐drying. J Microencapsul 16: 215–229. - PubMed
-
- Arora, N.K. , and Mishra, J. (2016) Prospecting the roles of metabolites and additives in future bioformulations for sustainable agriculture. Appl Soil Ecol 107: 405–407.
-
- Arora, N.K. , Khare, E. and Maheshwari, D.K. (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: constraints in bioformulation, commercialization, and future strategies In Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Microbiology Monographs 18. Maheshwari D.K. (ed). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag, pp. 97–116.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources