"Gaining or losing": The importance of the perspective in primary care health services valuation
- PMID: 29206847
- PMCID: PMC5716530
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188969
"Gaining or losing": The importance of the perspective in primary care health services valuation
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Economic theory classifies an intervention as socially beneficial if the total Willingness to Pay (WTP) of those who gain exceeds the total Willingness to accept (WTA) of those who are harmed. This paper examines the differences in health system users' valuation of a health care service in primary care setting based on the WTP and WTA perspectives, discussing the impact of personal and service variables, including risk attitudes, on these disparities.
Method: Six hundred and sixty two subjects who asked for care in health centres in the Region of Madrid (Spain) were interviewed, using the contingent valuation method to estimate WTP and WTA. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, health needs, satisfaction with the service and risk attitude and behaviour under risk (measured by self-reported scales and lottery games respectively) were collected. Generalised Linear Models were used to estimate the association between the explanatory variables and the WTA/WTP ratio.
Results: We obtained the WTA/WTP ratio for 570 subjects (mean 1.66 CI 95%: 1.53-1.79; median 1, interquartile range 1-2). People with higher education or in high social groups expressed WTA values closest to WTP. The opposite occurred in patients with the greatest health needs or who were born abroad. Self-reported expression of risk aversion appeared also related to increases in the WTA/WTP ratio. Satisfaction with the service evaluated was the most influential factor in the WTA/WTP ratio.
Conclusion: Health need, difficulty in obtaining substitutes and satisfaction with the service could serve for profiling people averse to loss for health care services in primary care setting. Self-reported expression of risk aversion could also be related to increases in the WTA/WTP ratio. This would mean that these characteristics should be taken into account both in the design and implementation of new healthcare interventions, as in the making decision for disinvestment.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Risk aversion, trust in institutions and contingent valuation of healthcare services: trying to explain the WTA-WTP gap in the Dutch population.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 May 5;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00281-9. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. PMID: 33952285 Free PMC article.
-
Differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for visits by a family physician: a contingent valuation study.BMC Public Health. 2010 May 10;10:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-236. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20459714 Free PMC article.
-
A study of the user's perception of economic value in nursing visits to primary care by the method of contingent valuation.BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 3;12:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-109. BMC Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21967306 Free PMC article.
-
Valuing Healthcare Goods and Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the WTA-WTP Disparity.Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 May;38(5):443-458. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00890-x. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020. PMID: 32096146
-
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose.Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(12):1207-14. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523120-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005. PMID: 16336015 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk aversion, trust in institutions and contingent valuation of healthcare services: trying to explain the WTA-WTP gap in the Dutch population.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 May 5;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00281-9. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. PMID: 33952285 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Foster MM, Earl PE, Haines TP, Mitchell GK. Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: Implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care. Health Policy (New York). 2010;97: 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Borghi J. Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. Health Econ. 2008;17: 863–75. doi: 10.1002/hec.1304 - DOI - PubMed
-
- O’Brien BJ, Goeree R, Gafni A, Torrance GW, Pauly M V, Erder H, et al. Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. Med Care. 1998;36: 370–384. - PubMed
-
- Sayman S. Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA—WTP disparity : A meta. J Econ Psychol. 2005;26: 289–312. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.002 - DOI
-
- Whynes DK, Sach TH. WTP and WTA: Do people think differently? Soc Sci Med. 2007;65: 946–957. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.014 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases