Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 5;12(12):e0189090.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189090. eCollection 2017.

Linking disease epidemiology and livestock productivity: The case of bovine respiratory disease in France

Affiliations

Linking disease epidemiology and livestock productivity: The case of bovine respiratory disease in France

Alexis Delabouglise et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Concerns are growing over the impact of livestock farming on environment and public health. The livestock industry is faced with the double constraint of limiting its use of natural resources and antimicrobials while ensuring its economic sustainability. In this context, reliable methods are needed to evaluate the effect of the prevention of endemic animal diseases on the productivity of livestock production systems. In this study, an epidemiological and productivity model was used to link changes in Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) incidence with the productivity of the beef and dairy cattle sectors in France. Cattle production parameters significantly affected by BRD were selected through literature review. Previous field study results and national cattle performance estimates were used to infer growth performances, mortality rates and carcass quality in the cattle affected and not affected by BRD. A steady-state deterministic herd production model was used to predict the productivity of the dairy and beef sector and their defined compartments (breeding-fattening, feedlot young bulls, and feedlot veal) in case of BRD incidence reduction by 20%, 50% or 100%. Results suggested that BRD should be controlled at a priority in beef breeding farms as eradication of BRD in beef calves would increase the whole beef sector's productivity by 4.7-5.5% while eradication in other production stages would result in lower productivity gain in their respective sectors. However, the analysis performed at compartment level showed that, in both the beef and dairy sector, young bull and veal feedlot enterprises derive more economic benefits from BRD eradication for their own compartment (increase in productivity of 8.7-12.8% for beef young bulls) than the breeding farms (increase in productivity of 5.1-6% for beef calves), which may limit the investments in BRD control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Methodological framework of the study.
The productivity model was used to infer the production value (PV), the total metabolizable energy requirement (TME) and the additional costs (AC) of the considered livestock system under alternative scenarios corresponding to status quo and different levels of BRD incidence rate reduction. Input data were obtained from the literature.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Representation of the French cattle value chain used in the study.
Arrow sizes and percentages indicate the assumed proportion of calves used for the different types of purposes in the beef and the dairy sector and periods at risk of BRD. Arrow ends correspond to the approximate time of departure from the livestock system (slaughter or export). Corresponding ages are indicated on the bottom orange timeline. Source: Groupe Economie du Bétail Institut de l’Elevage. La production de viande bovine en France: qui produit quoi, comment et où? Paris: Institut de l’Elevage. 2011.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Box-and-whisker representation of predicted differences in age at maturity of breeding females and young bulls affected and not affected by BRD in the beef and dairy sector.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Ranges of variation in productivity of the French beef and dairy sectors and their specific compartments in response to BRD eradication in different production stages.
Ranges are represented with box-and-whisker plots. Effects are differentiated according to sector and production stage where BRD is eradicated and level of analysis (sector or compartment).

References

    1. Rushton J. Anti-microbial Use in Animals: How to Assess the Trade-offs. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:10–21. doi: 10.1111/zph.12193 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanton AL, Kelton DF, LeBlanc SJ, Wormuth J, Leslie KE. The effect of respiratory disease and a preventative antibiotic treatment on growth, survival, age at first calving, and milk production of dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(9):4950–60. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5067 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fulton RW. Bovine respiratory disease research (1983–2009). Anim Health Res Rev. 2009;10(02):131–9. doi: 10.1017/s146625230999017x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor JD, Fulton RW, Lehenbauer TW, Step DL, Confer AW. The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: What is the evidence for predisposing factors? Can Vet J. 2010;51:1095–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lago A, McGuirk SM, Bennett TB, Cook NB, Nordlund KV. Calf Respiratory Disease and Pen Microenvironments in Naturally Ventilated Calf Barns in Winter. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:4014–25. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72445-6 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources