Role of Sonographic Gray-Scale Pattern Recognition in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses
- PMID: 29207785
- PMCID: PMC5713807
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28533.10614
Role of Sonographic Gray-Scale Pattern Recognition in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses
Abstract
Introduction: Characterization of adnexal masses as benign or malignant is of utmost importance for optimal management and prognostication. Ultrasound examination plays an important role in the differentiation of adnexal masses. Various sonographic characteristics have been recognised to differentiate benign and malignant adnexal masses. Subjective evaluation of gray-scale ultrasound images by an experienced ultrasound examiner to discriminate adnexal masses is known as "pattern recognition".
Aim: To access the efficacy of pattern recognition at predicting an accurate histological diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Materials and methods: All adnexal masses diagnosed clinically or during screening sonography were included in the study (n=136). Sonographic pattern recognition was performed and documented with specific diagnosis whenever feasible. Risk of Malignancy Index 3 (RMI3) score was also calculated. Results were compared with the gold standard histology. Chi-square test was used to assess the significance of the results and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: In the final cohort of 136 women, on pattern recognition, 91 were suspected to have benign adnexal masses and 45 were reported as malignant adnexal masses. However, on final histo-pathology, 94 patients had benign tumours and 42 patients had malignant disease. The benign group pattern recognition could render a specific diagnosis in 85.7% as compared to RMI3 pattern recognition conferred a sensitivity of 95.2% (RMI3 78.6%), with a slight compromise in the specificity (94.7% versus 96.8%).
Conclusion: Pattern recognition is a sensitive and specific sonographic tool in discriminating benign and malignant adnexal masses. Moreover, it is also useful in differentiating various benign adnexal masses.
Keywords: Benign; Malignant; Ultrasound examination.
Similar articles
-
Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.BMJ. 2010 Dec 14;341:c6839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6839. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 21156740 Free PMC article.
-
Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Nov 21;99(22):1706-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm199. Epub 2007 Nov 13. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 18000221
-
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21520475
-
[Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Nov;30(1 Suppl):S20-33. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001. PMID: 11917373 Review. French.
-
Adnexal masses: what is the role of ultrasonographic imaging?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;290(5):843-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3327-0. Epub 2014 Jul 6. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. PMID: 24997758 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses: A meta-analysis.Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):265. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9395. Epub 2020 Oct 27. Exp Ther Med. 2020. PMID: 33199990 Free PMC article.
-
IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules for Triage of Adnexal Mass: Experience from South India.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Aug;69(4):356-362. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01229-z. Epub 2019 May 3. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019. PMID: 31391744 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. - PubMed
-
- Valentin L. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging:the contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology:the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;14(5):338–47. - PubMed
-
- Tingulstad S, Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen T, Nustad K, Onsrud M, et al. The risk-of-malignancy index to evaluate potential ovarian cancers in local hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(3):448–52. - PubMed
-
- Utrilla-Layna J, Alcazar JL, Auba M, Laparte C, Olartecoechea B, Errasti T, et al. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(5):613–17. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources