Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women
- PMID: 29207971
- PMCID: PMC5718024
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3841-0
Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women
Abstract
Background: In spite of the increasing incidence of in situ breast cancer, the information about the risk factors of in situ breast cancer (DCIS) is scarce as compared to the information available for invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC), with inconsistent findings regarding the difference in risk factors between DCIS and IDC.
Methods: We enrolled 472 women with IDC and 90 women with DCIS and 1088 controls matching for age and menopausal status. Information on risk factors was collected through self-administered questionnaire. Percent mammographic dense area (PDA), absolute mammographic dense area (ADA), and nondense area were assessed using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by conditional logistic regression model with adjustment for covariates.
Results: Later age at menarche and regular physical exercise were associated with decreased risk of IDC, whereas alcohol consumption, previous benign breast disease, and family history of breast cancer were associated with increased risk of IDC. For DCIS, previous benign breast disease and alcohol consumption were associated with the increased risk, and regular physical exercise was associated with decreased risk. Increase of ADA by 1-quartile level and PDA increase by 10% were associated with 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.21) and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.19) times greater risk of IDC, respectively. The increase of ADA by 1-quartile level and PDA increase by 10% were associated with 1.17 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.50) times and 1.11 (95% CI:0.90,1.37) times greater risk of DCIS, respectively, but the associations were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the association with risk factors and mammographic density measures between IDC and DCIS (P > 0.1).
Conclusions: Differential associations of DCIS with mammographic density and risk factors as compared with the associations of IDC were not evident. This finding suggests that IDC and DCIS develop through the shared causal pathways.
Keywords: Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive ductal breast cancer; Mammographic density.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (SMC2011–06-052). The Board waived informed consent for the retrospectively recruited subjects and all prospectively recruited subjects provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer risk factor associations differ for pure versus invasive carcinoma with an in situ component in case-control and case-case analyses.Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Feb;27(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0696-z. Epub 2015 Nov 30. Cancer Causes Control. 2016. PMID: 26621543 Free PMC article.
-
Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.Breast Cancer. 2011 Oct;18(4):286-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-009-0192-y. Epub 2010 Feb 9. Breast Cancer. 2011. PMID: 20143189
-
Mammographic density as a predictor of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in over six million South Korean women.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(2):341-350. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07648-z. Epub 2025 Feb 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 40019668
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ: a disease entity that merits more recognition.Minerva Chir. 2015 Aug;70(4):231-9. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Minerva Chir. 2015. PMID: 25916193 Review.
-
Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):139-41. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq027. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20956818 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Sep;177(2):251-276. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05300-1. Epub 2019 Jun 8. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019. PMID: 31177342 Review.
-
Identification of aberrant gene expression during breast ductal carcinoma in situ progression to invasive ductal carcinoma.J Int Med Res. 2020 Jan;48(1):300060518815364. doi: 10.1177/0300060518815364. Epub 2019 Feb 3. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 30712460 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for estrogen receptor positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in African American women.Breast. 2020 Feb;49:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Nov 6. Breast. 2020. PMID: 31786415 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials