Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 6;15(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x.

Alliance members' roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada

Affiliations

Alliance members' roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada

Erica Di Ruggiero et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is a multi-stakeholder alliance founded in 2006 to advance population health intervention research (PHIR). PHIRIC aimed to strengthen Canada's capacity to conduct and use such research to inform policy and practice to improve the public's health by building PHIR as a field of research. In 2014, an evaluative study of PHIRIC at organisational and system levels was conducted, guided by a field-building and collaborative action perspective.

Methods: The study involved 17 qualitative key informant interviews with 21 current and former PHIRIC Planning Committee and Working Group members. The interviews examined how individuals and organisations were acting as champions and exerting leadership in building the field of PHIR.

Results: Founding PHIRIC organisational members have been championing PHIR at organisational and system levels. While the PHIR field has progressed in terms of enhanced funding, legitimacy, profile and capacity, some members and organisations faced constraints and challenges acting as leaders and champions in their respective environments. Expectations about the future of PHIRIC and field-building of PHIR were mixed, where longer-term and founding members of PHIRIC expressed more optimism than recent members. All agreed on the need for incorporating perspectives of decision-makers into PHIR directions and initiatives.

Conclusions: The findings contribute to understanding alliance members' roles in leadership and championship for field-building more generally, and for population health and PHIR specifically. Building this field requires multi-level efforts, collaborative action and distributed leadership to create the necessary conditions for PHIRIC members to both benefit from and contribute to advancing PHIR as a field. Lessons from this 'made in Canada' model may be of interest to other countries regarding the structures needed for PHIR field-building.

Keywords: Alliance; Field-building; Population health intervention research; Research capacity-building.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research: Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada. 2012. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/38731.html. Accessed 31 Aug 2016.
    1. Hawe P, Potvin L. What is population health intervention research? Can J Public Health. 2009;100(1 Suppl):I8–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Population health intervention research: advancing the field. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(7 Suppl):Frankish. http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/cjph.103.3624, https://journal.cpha.ca/index.php/cjph/article/viewFile/3705/2696. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Millward LM, Kelly MP, Nutbeam D. Public Health Intervention Research—The Evidence. London: Health Development Agency; 2003.
    1. Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell EM, Htun AT, Bailey LJ, Millar C. We are what we do: research outputs for public health. Am J Prev Med. 2008;3:280–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources