Alliance members' roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada
- PMID: 29208021
- PMCID: PMC5718088
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x
Alliance members' roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada
Abstract
Background: The Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is a multi-stakeholder alliance founded in 2006 to advance population health intervention research (PHIR). PHIRIC aimed to strengthen Canada's capacity to conduct and use such research to inform policy and practice to improve the public's health by building PHIR as a field of research. In 2014, an evaluative study of PHIRIC at organisational and system levels was conducted, guided by a field-building and collaborative action perspective.
Methods: The study involved 17 qualitative key informant interviews with 21 current and former PHIRIC Planning Committee and Working Group members. The interviews examined how individuals and organisations were acting as champions and exerting leadership in building the field of PHIR.
Results: Founding PHIRIC organisational members have been championing PHIR at organisational and system levels. While the PHIR field has progressed in terms of enhanced funding, legitimacy, profile and capacity, some members and organisations faced constraints and challenges acting as leaders and champions in their respective environments. Expectations about the future of PHIRIC and field-building of PHIR were mixed, where longer-term and founding members of PHIRIC expressed more optimism than recent members. All agreed on the need for incorporating perspectives of decision-makers into PHIR directions and initiatives.
Conclusions: The findings contribute to understanding alliance members' roles in leadership and championship for field-building more generally, and for population health and PHIR specifically. Building this field requires multi-level efforts, collaborative action and distributed leadership to create the necessary conditions for PHIRIC members to both benefit from and contribute to advancing PHIR as a field. Lessons from this 'made in Canada' model may be of interest to other countries regarding the structures needed for PHIR field-building.
Keywords: Alliance; Field-building; Population health intervention research; Research capacity-building.
Conflict of interest statement
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Building the field of population health intervention research: The development and use of an initial set of competencies.Prev Med Rep. 2015 Oct 13;2:854-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.017. eCollection 2015. Prev Med Rep. 2015. PMID: 26844160 Free PMC article.
-
Can the Canadian Heart Health Initiative inform the population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada?Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I20-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405505. Can J Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19263979 Free PMC article.
-
Building knowledge development and exchange capacity in Canada: lessons from Youth Excel.Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2014 Jul;34(2-3):154-62. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2014. PMID: 24991778 English, French.
-
Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30219065 Free PMC article.
-
Improving organizational capacity to address health literacy in public health: a rapid realist review.Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24923994 Review.
Cited by
-
Building the field of food systems research: commentary on a research funder's role.Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 16;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00745-7. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021. PMID: 34271926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research: Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada. 2012. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/38731.html. Accessed 31 Aug 2016.
-
- Population health intervention research: advancing the field. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(7 Suppl):Frankish. http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/cjph.103.3624, https://journal.cpha.ca/index.php/cjph/article/viewFile/3705/2696. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Millward LM, Kelly MP, Nutbeam D. Public Health Intervention Research—The Evidence. London: Health Development Agency; 2003.
-
- Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell EM, Htun AT, Bailey LJ, Millar C. We are what we do: research outputs for public health. Am J Prev Med. 2008;3:280–5. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources